In the products of Nature there are no freaks, or impish tricks
performed, and it is not for nothing she does her work. Every one of
them asks for and should receive an explanation consistent with fact
and reason, and here comes in the need for studying, as one may, the
broad outlines of man’s ancestry. His ancestor being now sought in an
earlier and more generalized stock than that of the four genera of
anthropoid apes known to us, the most instructive and safest line to
take is to trace him back to the stock lemur, who remains to-day among
the most Chinese or unchanging of known mammals. In his illuminating
work, _Prehistoric Man and History_, Professor Scott Elliott adopts an
excellent term, “lemur-monkey-man,” to sum up, without missing links,
the long ancestry of man. I take the liberty of adapting this term more
closely to the present inquiry and use that of _lemur-ape-man_ instead,
for whatever may be the relation of man to present apes some ape-like
ancestors enter into his genealogical tree.[45] For my purpose the
monkey is less useful because his hair-slope differs so little from
that of lemurs, whereas apes have made for themselves a very remarkable
position as regards the hair of their forearms. Our series of animals
for study is then well represented by the lemur-ape-man--hypothetical,
necessary and serviceable. Through all the immense stretch of time
occupied in this process of descent there has been ample opportunity
for the lemur to change his fashion to that of the ape, and the latter
to change to the present fashion of man.
[45] This was written before the publication of Professor
Woods-Jones’ book _Arboreal Man_.
This simple arrangement of the lemur’s hair is common to that of all
the more primitive long-bodied mammals, of which an otter is a good
example, and I venture, greatly daring, to call this the normal slope
of hair. Somewhere and somehow in the human tree there has appeared
a total reversal of the lemur-type; the stock of apes acquired a new
fashion, and gradually discarded altogether their ancient inheritance,
beginning their innovation perhaps, with _Dryopithecus fontani_ in the
Miocene Age.
The Dynamics of Hair-Pattern.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account