Another curious Rana is the Tree-frog. He is smaller than any of his
cousins, and may be known by his bright green dress, which is spotted
with black, and by a membrane stretched between his toes, which gives
him a broad, flat surface, while it helps to sustain him as he leaps,
somewhat after the fashion of a flying squirrel, from branch to branch.
In tropical regions, where many of the trees are bedecked with gorgeous
blossoms, Tree-frogs appear in the gayest of colors, the splendor of
their garb being protective in such surroundings.
Dressed in black and light brown, and living in marshes in the
Eastern United States, is another species--the Swamp-frog. His voice
is a prolonged croak, which, to the practised ear, can be readily
distinguished from the bawl of Clamata, or the roar of the Bull-frog.
Cats, geese, hawks, vultures, owls and other animals eat frogs, and the
luckless creatures can scarcely appear without finding an enemy. But
nature, who is a very wise and considerate mother, provides a means for
balancing this great destruction of their forces in endowing them with
wonderful reproductive organs. So prolific are frogs, that when the
little black tadpoles appear, so thickly are they huddled together that
the pond seems literally alive with their swimming forms.
In the same class of animals to which the frogs belong, as well as to
the same order, but to a different sub-order, are placed the toads,
somewhat remote cousins of the frogs. As the frog is well-known about
our ponds, so the toad is a constant denizen of our groves and gardens.
The frog, you have been told, is a species of Rana, and now I shall
introduce to you the toad as a species of Bufo. In general anatomy they
are alike. Their eggs and young are closely similar, and the stages
of growth from egg to adult form are nearly identical. When the adult
stage is attained the frogs and toads are very tiny creatures, but,
small as they are, they are readily distinguishable from each other by
the conformation of the snout, and by the larger development of the
hind-legs of the frog. Their chief differences will now be enumerated.
The toad has no teeth, but the frog, as has been stated before, has
teeth in both the upper jaw and the palate. Similarly attached is the
tongue, but the free end of the frog’s tongue is forked, and the toad’s
entire. The skin of the toad is usually warty, while the frog’s is
smooth. A rounder body, shorter hind-legs, less fully webbed feet and
more rounded snout still further distinguish the toad from the frog.
Their soft moist skin shows them to be Amphibians. The absence of tails
places them among the Anuran, or Tailless Amphibians. Thus far they
agree well together, but differences loom up upon careful examination,
and we are compelled to say of the frog that he belongs to the Ranidæ,
and of the toad that he belongs to the Bufonidæ. Of the two animals,
the toad is by far the more interesting and useful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account