Produced by A www.PGDP.net Volunteer, Dave Morgan, Richard J. Shiffer and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net [Transcriber's Note: Every effort has been made to replicate this text as faithfully as possible, including obsolete and variant spellings and other inconsistencies.] INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT CONSIDERED IN SOME OF ITS RELATIONS TO ETHICS AND POLITICAL ECONOMY BY GEORGE HAVEN PUTNAM AN ADDRESS DELIVERED JANUARY 29TH, 1878, BEFORE THE NEW YORK FREE-TRADE CLUB NEW YORK G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS 182 FIFTH AVENUE 1879. COPYRIGHT, 1879, BY G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS. INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT.[1] [1] A paper read January 29th, 1878, before the New York Free-Trade Club. The questions relating to copyright belong naturally to the sphere of political economy. They have to do with the laws governing production, and with the principles regulating supply and demand; and they are directly dependent upon a due determining of the proper functions of legislation, and of the relations which legislation, having for its end the welfare of the community as a whole, ought to bear towards production and trade. As students of economic science, we recognize the fact that, in all its phases, it is in reality based upon two or three very simple propositions, such as: Two plus two make four. Two from one you can't. That which a man has created by his own labor is his own, to do what he will with, subject only to his proportionate contribution to the cost of carrying on the organization of the community under the protection of which his labor has been accomplished, and to the single limitation that the results of his labor shall not be used to the detriment of his fellow-men. It is not in the power of legislators to make or to modify the laws of trade; it is their business to act in accordance with these laws. Economic science is, then, but the systematizing, on the basis of a few generally accepted principles, of the relations of men as regards their labor and the results of their labor, namely, their property. There is therefore an essential connection between the systems governing all these relations, however varied they may be. Soundness of thought in regard to one group of them leads to soundness of thought about the others. Interested as we are in the work of bringing the community to a sound and logical standard of economic faith and practice, it is important for us to recognize and to emphasize the essential relations connecting as well the different _scientific_ positions as the various sets of _fallacious_ assumptions. Further, we can hardly lay too much stress upon the oft-repeated dictum that a system may be correct in theory yet pernicious in practice, maintaining, as we do, that where the application of a theory brings failure the result is due either to the unsoundness of the theory or to some blundering in its application.