International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second EditionOppenheim, L. (Lassa)
History
International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second Edition
Oppenheim, L. (Lassa)
International law
ARBITRATION
Grotius, II. c. 23, § 8--Vattel, II. § 329--Hall, § 119--Westlake,
I. pp. 332-356--Lawrence, § 221--Phillimore, III. §§ 3-5--Twiss,
II. § 5--Taylor, §§ 357-358--Wharton, III. § 316--Moore, VII. §§
1069-1080--Bluntschli, §§ 488-498--Heffter, § 109--Bulmerincq in
Holtzendorff, IV. pp. 30-58--Ullmann, §§ 154-156--Bonfils, Nos.
944-969--Despagnet, Nos. 722-741--Pradier-Fodéré, VI. Nos.
2602-2630--Mérignhac, I. pp. 448-485--Rivier, II. § 59--Calvo,
III. §§ 1706-1806--Fiore, II. Nos. 1202-1215, and Code, Nos.
1294-1380--Nys, III. pp. 65-80--Martens, II. § 104--Rouard de
Card, _L'arbitrage international_ (1876)--Mérignhac, _Traité
théorique et pratique de l'arbitrage_ (1895)--Moore, _History and
Digest of the Arbitrations to which the United States has been a
Party_, 6 vols. (1898)--Darby, _International Arbitration_, 4th
ed. (1904)--Dumas, _Les sanctions de l'arbitrage international_
(1905), and in A.J. V. (1911), pp. 934-957--Nippold, Die
_Fortbildung des Verfahrens in völkerrechtlichen Streitigkeiten_
(1907)--Reinsch in A.J. V. (1911), pp. 604-614--Scott,
_Conferences_, pp. 188-253--Lapradelle et Politis, _Recueil des
arbitrages internationaux_, I. (1798-1855), (1905)--Fried,
_Handbuch der Friedensbewegung_, 2nd ed. (1911), pp.
135-184--Morris, _International Arbitration and Procedure_
(1911)--Balch, _International Courts of Arbitration_ (4th ed.,
with an introduction and additional notes by Thomas Willing Balch,
1912).
[Sidenote: Conception of Arbitration.]
§ 12. Arbitration is the name for the determination of differences
between States through the verdict of one or more umpires chosen by the
parties. As there is no central political authority above the Sovereign
States, and no such International Court as could exercise jurisdiction
over them, State differences, unlike differences between private
individuals, cannot as a rule be obligatorily settled in courts of
justice. The only way in which a settlement of State differences through
a verdict may be arrived at is by the conflicting States voluntarily
consenting to submit themselves to a verdict of one or more umpires
chosen by themselves for that purpose.
[Sidenote: Treaty of Arbitration.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account