International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second EditionOppenheim, L. (Lassa)
History
International Law. A Treatise. Volume 2 (of 2): War and Neutrality. Second Edition
Oppenheim, L. (Lassa)
International law
§ 43. The value of reprisals as a means of settling international
differences is analogous to the value of retorsion. States will have
recourse to reprisals for such international delinquencies as they think
insufficiently important for a declaration of war, but too important to
be entirely overlooked. That reprisals are rather a rough means for the
settlement of differences, and that the institution of reprisals can
give and has in the past given occasion to abuse in case of a difference
between a powerful and a weak State, cannot be denied. On the other
hand, as there is no Court and no central authority above the Sovereign
States which could compel a delinquent State to give reparation, the
institution of reprisals can scarcely be abolished. The influence in the
future of the existence of a Permanent Court of Arbitration remains to
be seen. If all the States would become parties to the Hague Convention
for the peaceful adjustment of international differences, and if they
would have recourse to the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague
in all cases of an alleged international delinquency which affects
neither their national honour nor their vital interests and
independence, acts of reprisal would almost disappear.
IV
PACIFIC BLOCKADE
Hall, § 121--Lawrence, § 138--Westlake, II. pp. 11-18--Taylor, §
444--Moore, VII. § 1097--Bluntschli, §§ 506-507--Heffter, §
112--Bulmerincq in Holtzendorff, IV. pp. 116-127--Ullmann, §
162--Bonfils, Nos. 986-994--Despagnet, Nos.
496-498--Pradier-Fodéré, V. Nos. 2483-2489, VI. No. 2648--Rivier,
II. § 60--Nys, III. pp. 91-94--Calvo, III. §§ 1832-1859--Fiore,
II. No. 1231, and Code, Nos. 1404-1414--Martens, II. 105--Holland,
_Studies_, pp. 151-167--Deane, _The Law of Blockade_ (1870), pp.
45-48--Fauchille, _Du blocus maritime_ (1882), pp. 37-67--Falcke,
_Die Hauptperioden der sogenannten Friedensblockade_ (1891), and
in the _Zeitschrift für Internationales Recht_, XIX. (1909), pp.
63-175--Barès, _Le blocus pacifique_ (1898)--Ducrocq,
_Représailles en temps de paix_ (1901), pp. 58-174--Hogan,
_Pacific Blockade_ (1908)--Söderquist, _Le Blocus Maritime_
(1908)--Staudacher, _Die Friedensblockade_ (1909)--Westlake in
_The Law Quarterly Review_, XXV. (1909), pp. 13-23.
[Sidenote: Development of practice of Pacific Blockade.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account