Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
There is one advantage in the above direct argument, as
against deduction from Zermelo's theorem, that the above
argument does not demand the universal truth of the multiplicative
axiom, but only its truth as applied to a set of classes.
It may happen that the axiom holds for classes, though not
for larger numbers of classes. For this reason it is better, when
[Pg 129]
it is possible, to content ourselves with the more restricted
assumption. The assumption made in the above direct argument
is that a product of factors is never zero unless one of
the factors is zero. We may state this assumption in the form:
" is a multipliable number," where a number is defined as
"multipliable" when a product of factors is never zero unless
one of the factors is zero. We can prove that a finite number is
always multipliable, but we cannot prove that any infinite number
is so. The multiplicative axiom is equivalent to the assumption
that all cardinal numbers are multipliable. But in order to
identify the reflexive with the non-inductive, or to deal with the
problem of the boots and socks, or to show that any progression
of numbers of the second class is of the second class, we only
need the very much smaller assumption that is multipliable.
It is not improbable that there is much to be discovered
in regard to the topics discussed in the present chapter. Cases
may be found where propositions which seem to involve the
multiplicative axiom can be proved without it. It is conceivable
that the multiplicative axiom in its general form may be shown
to be false. From this point of view, Zermelo's theorem offers
the best hope: the continuum or some still more dense series
might be proved to be incapable of having its terms well ordered,
which would prove the multiplicative axiom false, in virtue of
Zermelo's theorem. But so far, no method of obtaining such
results has been discovered, and the subject remains wrapped in
obscurity.
[Pg 130]
CHAPTER XIII
THE AXIOM OF INFINITY AND LOGICAL TYPES
THE axiom of infinity is an assumption which may be enunciated
as follows:—
"If be any inductive cardinal number, there is at least one
class of individuals having terms."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account