Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
When we say that something is "always true" or "true in
all cases," it is clear that the "something" involved cannot be
a proposition. A proposition is just true or false, and there
is an end of the matter. There are no instances or cases of
"Socrates is a man" or "Napoleon died at St Helena." These
are propositions, and it would be meaningless to speak of their
being true "in all cases." This phrase is only applicable to
propositional functions. Take, for example, the sort of thing
that is often said when causation is being discussed. (We are
net concerned with the truth or falsehood of what is said, but
only with its logical analysis.) We are told that is, in every
instance, followed by . Now if there are "instances" of ,
must be some general concept of which it is significant to say
" is ," " is ," " is ,"
and so on, where , , are
particulars which are not identical one with another. This
applies, e.g., to our previous case of lightning. We say that
lightning () is followed by thunder (). But the separate
flashes are particulars, not identical, but sharing the common
property of being lightning. The only way of expressing a
[Pg 157]
common property generally is to say that a common property
of a number of objects is a propositional function which becomes
true when any one of these objects is taken as the value of the
variable. In this case all the objects are "instances" of the
truth of the propositional function—for a propositional function,
though it cannot itself be true or false, is true in certain instances
and false in certain others, unless it is "always true" or "always
false." When, to return to our example, we say that is in
every instance followed by , we mean that, whatever may be,
if is an , it is followed by a ; that is,
we are asserting that
a certain propositional function is "always true."
Sentences involving such words as "all," "every," "a,"
"the," "some" require propositional functions for their interpretation.
The way in which propositional functions occur
can be explained by means of two of the above words, namely,
"all" and "some."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account