Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy — John Shaqi
Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
Assuming that the number of individuals in the universe is
not finite, we have now succeeded not only in defining Peano's
[Pg 24]
three primitive ideas, but in seeing how to prove his five primitive
propositions, by means of primitive ideas and propositions belonging
to logic. It follows that all pure mathematics, in so far
as it is deducible from the theory of the natural numbers, is only
a prolongation of logic. The extension of this result to those
modern branches of mathematics which are not deducible from
the theory of the natural numbers offers no difficulty of principle,
as we have shown elsewhere.[7]
[7]For geometry, in so far as it is not purely analytical, see Principles of
Mathematics, part VI.; for rational dynamics, ibid., part VII.
The process of mathematical induction, by means of which
we defined the natural numbers, is capable of generalisation.
We defined the natural numbers as the "posterity" of 0 with
respect to the relation of a number to its immediate successor.
If we call this relation , any number will have this relation
to . A property is "hereditary with respect to ," or
simply "-hereditary," if, whenever the property belongs to a
number , it also belongs to , i.e. to the number to which
has the relation . And a number will be said to belong to
the "posterity" of with respect to the relation if has
every -hereditary property belonging to . These definitions
can all be applied to any other relation just as well as to . Thus
if is any relation whatever, we can lay down the following
definitions:[8]—
[8]These definitions, and the generalised theory of induction, are due to
Frege, and were published so long ago as 1879 in his Begriffsschrift. In
spite of the great value of this work, I was, I believe, the first person who
ever read it—more than twenty years after its publication.
A property is called "-hereditary" when, if it belongs to
a term , and has the relation to ,
then it belongs to .
A class is -hereditary when its defining property
is -hereditary.
A term is said to be an "-ancestor" of the
term if has
every -hereditary property that has,
provided is a term
which has the relation to something or to which something
has the relation . (This is only to exclude trivial cases.)
[Pg 25]
The "-posterity" of is all the terms of
which is an -ancestor.
We have framed the above definitions so that if a term is the
ancestor of anything it is its own ancestor and belongs to its own
posterity. This is merely for convenience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account