Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
A relation is serial when it is an aliorelative, transitive, and
connected; or, what is equivalent, when it is asymmetrical,
transitive, and connected.
A series is the same thing as a serial relation.
It might have been thought that a series should be the field
of a serial relation, not the serial relation itself. But this would
be an error. For example,
are six different series which all have the same field. If the
field were the series, there could only be one series with a given
field. What distinguishes the above six series is simply the
different ordering relations in the six cases. Given the ordering
relation, the field and the order are both determinate. Thus
the ordering relation may be taken to be the series, but the field
cannot be so taken.
Given any serial relation, say , we shall say that, in respect
of this relation, "precedes" if has the relation
to ,
which we shall write "" for short. The three characteristics
which must have in order to be serial are:
(1) We must never have , i.e. no term must precede
itself.
(2) must imply , i.e.
if precedes and precedes , must
precede .
(3) If and are two different terms in the field of , we shall
have or , i.e. one of the two must precede the
other.
The reader can easily convince himself that, where these three
properties are found in an ordering relation, the characteristics
we expect of series will also be found, and vice versa. We are
therefore justified in taking the above as a definition of order
[Pg 34]
or series. And it will be observed that the definition is effected
in purely logical terms.
Although a transitive asymmetrical connected relation always
exists wherever there is a series, it is not always the relation
which would most naturally be regarded as generating the series.
The natural-number series may serve as an illustration. The
relation we assumed in considering the natural numbers was
the relation of immediate succession, i.e. the relation between
consecutive integers. This relation is asymmetrical, but not
transitive or connected. We can, however, derive from it,
by the method of mathematical induction, the "ancestral"
relation which we considered in the preceding chapter. This
relation will be the same as "less than or equal to" among
inductive integers. For purposes of generating the series of
natural numbers, we want the relation "less than," excluding
"equal to." This is the relation of to when is an ancestor
of but not identical with , or (what comes to the same thing)
when the successor of is an ancestor of in the sense in which
a number is its own ancestor. That is to say, we shall lay down
the following definition:—
An inductive number is said to be less than another number
when possesses every hereditary property possessed by the
successor of .
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account