Introduction to Mathematical PhilosophyRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
Russell, Bertrand
Mathematics -- Philosophy
We dealt in the preceding chapter with a supremely important
class, namely, serial relations. Each of the three properties which
we combined in defining series—namely, asymmetry, transitiveness,
and connexity—has its own importance. We will begin by saying
something on each of these three.
Asymmetry, i.e. the property of being incompatible with the
converse, is a characteristic of the very greatest interest and
importance. In order to develop its functions, we will consider
various examples. The relation husband is asymmetrical, and
so is the relation wife; i.e. if is husband of ,
cannot be husband
of , and similarly in the case of wife. On the other hand, the
relation "spouse" is symmetrical: if is spouse of , then is
spouse of . Suppose now we are given the relation spouse, and
we wish to derive the relation husband. Husband is the same as
male spouse or spouse of a female; thus the relation husband can
[Pg 42]
be derived from spouse either by limiting the domain to males
or by limiting the converse to females. We see from this instance
that, when a symmetrical relation is given, it is sometimes possible,
without the help of any further relation, to separate it into two
asymmetrical relations. But the cases where this is possible are
rare and exceptional: they are cases where there are two mutually
exclusive classes, say and , such that whenever the relation
holds between two terms, one of the terms is a member of and
the other is a member of —as, in the case of spouse, one term
of the relation belongs to the class of males and one to the class
of females. In such a case, the relation with its domain confined
to will be asymmetrical, and so will the relation with its domain
confined to . But such cases are not of the sort that occur
when we are dealing with series of more than two terms; for in
a series, all terms, except the first and last (if these exist), belong
both to the domain and to the converse domain of the generating
relation, so that a relation like husband, where the domain and
converse domain do not overlap, is excluded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account