Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1Hallam, Henry
History
Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Centuries, Vol. 1
Hallam, Henry
Literature, Modern -- History and criticism
[383] Heeren, p. 149, says that Hegius began to preside over the school
of Deventer in 1480; but I think the date in the text is more
probable, as Erasmus left it at the age of fourteen, and was
certainly born in 1465. Though Hegius is said to have known but
little Greek, I find in Panzer the title of a book by him, printed
at Deventer in 1501, De Utilitate Lingua Græcæ. The life of Hegius
in Melchior Adam is interesting. Primus hic in Belgio literas
excitavit, says Revius, in Daventria Illustrata, p. 130. Mihi, says
Erasmus, admodum adhuc puero contigit uti præceptore hujus
discipulo Alexandro Hegio Westphalo, qui ludum aliquando celebrem
oppidi Daventriensis moderabatur, in quo nos olim admodum pueri
utriusque linguæ prima didicimus elementa. Adag. Chil. 1, cent. iv.
39. In another place he says of Hegius, ne hic quidem Græcarum
literarum omnino ignarus est. Epist. 411, in Appendice. Erasmus
left Deventer at the age of fourteen; consequently in 1479 or 1480,
as he tells us in an epistle, dated 17th Apr. 1519.
[384] This very rare book, unnoticed by most bibliographers, is of some
importance in the history of literature. It is a small quarto
tract, entitled, Conjugations verborum Græcæ, Daventriæ noviter
extremo labore et impressæ. No date or printer’s name appears. A
copy is in the British Museum, and another in Lord Spencer’s
library. It contains nothing but the word τυπτω [typtô] in all its
voices and tenses, with Latin explanations in Gothic letters. The
Greek types are very rude, and the characters sometimes misplaced.
It must, I should presume, seem probable to every one who considers
this book, that it is of the fifteenth century, and consequently
older than any known Greek on this side of the Alps; which of
itself should render it interesting in the eyes of bibliographers
and of every one else. But fully disclaiming all such acquaintance
with the technical science of typographical antiquity, as to
venture any judgment founded on the appearance of a particular
book, or on a comparison of it with others, I would, on other
grounds, suggest the probability that this little attempt at Greek
Grammar issued from the Deventer press about 1480. It appears clear
that whoever “collected with extreme labour” these forms of the
verb τυπτω [typtô], had never been possessed of a Greek and Latin
grammar. For would it not be absurd to use such expressions about a
simple transcription? Besides which, the word is not only given in
an arrangement different from any I have ever seen, but with a
nonexistent form of participle, τετυψαμενος [tetypsamenos] for
τυψαμενος [typsamenos], which could not surely have been found in
any prior grammar. Now the grammar of Lascaris was published with a
Latin translation by Craston in 1480.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account