Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament — John Shaqi
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
4. The first to prepare a really critical edition of the Greek New
Testament, _i.e._ one based on a collation of manuscripts, was Simon de
Colines (COLINAEUS), the father-in-law of the Parisian printer Robert
Stephen (Estienne). In his edition^1, which appeared in 1534, he adopted
for the first time a number of readings that are now generally accepted,
though naturally he did not succeed in gaining credit for them. Up till
the time of Mill and Bengel the publishers and their more or less
uncritical coadjutors simply reprinted the text of Ximenes and Erasmus,
mostly the latter, with trifling variations.
Among the innovations introduced by these editors was the choice of a
more convenient form. The first editions were all in folio. But in 1521,
Anselm, then in Hagenau but previously in Tübingen, reduced the size to
quarto; in 1524 Cephaleus in Strassburg still further to octavo; while
Valder printed the first miniature edition in Basel in 1536. The
smallest edition printed previous to this century is that of Jannon,
1628 (Sedan); the smallest of this century is that of Pickering, 1828
(London).
But a much more important feature was the collation of fresh
manuscripts. The credit of being pioneer in this respect rests with the
Parisian Typographer-Royal, Robert STEPHEN (1503-1559). [Sidenote:
Stephen.] He was assisted by his son Henry Stephen (1528-1598),
particularly in the preparation of his third edition of 1550, the
_Editio Regia_, which takes its name from the inscription on its
title-page in honour of Henry II., Βασιλεῖ τ’ ἀγαθῷ, κρατερῷ τ’
αἰχμητῇ.[6] The first edition, called _O mirificam_, from the opening
words of its preface, appeared in 1546. The Editio Regia was the first
to contain a critical apparatus in which fifteen manuscripts indicated
by the Greek letters β—ιϛ were collated with the text of the
Complutensian which was designated α. All the manuscripts employed were
of late date, with two exceptions, viz., the Codex Bezae, of which we
shall have a good deal to say in the sequel, and a Parisian MS. of the
eighth century, now known as L.
[Sidenote: Verse division.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account