Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
This version, formerly designated as the Coptic, was first used for the
New Testament by Bishop Fell of Oxford, who was indebted for his
knowledge of it to Marshall. It was afterwards employed by Mill for his
edition of 1707. It was first published in 1716 by Wilkins (or rather
Wilke), a Prussian who had settled in England, with the title, “Novum
Testamentum Aegyptium vulgo Copticum.” His edition was accompanied with
a Latin translation. In 1734 Bengel obtained a few particulars regarding
this version from La Croze, the Berlin Librarian. An edition of the
Gospels by Moritz Schwartze appeared in 1846-47, and after his death the
Acts and Epistles were published (1852) by Paul Boetticher, afterwards
distinguished under his adopted name of de Lagarde. About the same time
Tattam prepared a wholly uncritical edition of the entire New Testament,
including the Apocalypse which did not originally form part of this
version.[109] Steindorff is of opinion that the Bohairic version
originated in the Natron Valley during the fourth or fifth century, but
others affirm that it is older, or at all events rests on an older
foundation. The order of the New Testament books was originally: (1) the
Gospels, in which John stood first, followed by Matthew, Mark, Luke, (2)
the Pauline Epistles, with Hebrews between 2 Thess. and 1 Tim., (3) the
seven Catholic Epistles, and (4) the Acts. More than fifty Bohairic
manuscripts are preserved in the libraries of Europe, and from these an
edition has been prepared for the Clarendon Press in two volumes, with
exhaustive Introduction by G. Horner (1898).
The Greek text on which this version is based is regarded by present
critics as particularly pure, and free from so-called Western additions.
(2.) _The Sahidic Version._
[Sidenote: Sahidic.]
It was a long time before this version attracted any attention. In his
New Testament, Wilkins mentioned two manuscripts, “lingua plane a
reliquis MSS. Copticis diversa,” and Woide in 1778 announced his
intention of editing certain fragments of the New Testament “iuxta
interpretationem superioris Aegypti quae Thebaidica vocatur,” which were
afterwards published by Ford in 1799. At the close of last century and
the beginning of this, various other fragments were issued by Tuki,
Mingarelli, Münter, Zoega, and Engelbreth, but it was not till more
recent times that really important parts of the Old and New Testaments
were published by Amélineau, Ciasca (in two vols.), Bouriant, Maspero,
Ceugney, and Krall. In 1895 Goussen gave us a large part of the
Apocalypse.[110] This version, like the former, contained the entire New
Testament, with the exception of the Apocalypse, and originally
exhibited the Gospels in the same order—John, Matthew, Mark, Luke.
Hebrews, however, stood between 2 Corinthians and Galatians. Its Greek
original was quite different from that of the Bohairic version. (See
Plate VIII.)
(3.) _The Middle Egyptian Versions._
[Sidenote: Middle Egyptian.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account