Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
With regard to the former task, it might not be essential to make such a
minute collation of the manuscripts as Ferrar, Hoskier, and other
investigators deemed necessary, and as is certainly the right thing to
do in the case of the oldest documents. With such a mode of procedure,
the task could not be accomplished in any conceivable time. But suppose
the work was organised the way that Reuss did with the printed editions,
by selecting say a thousand passages for comparison, it would be
possible, and in a very short time we should be much better informed
than we are at present as to the state of the text in our manuscripts,
and especially in the minuscules.
Such a task, moreover, must be preceded by a fresh scientific statement
of the way in which the text was propagated previous to the invention of
printing, on the lines laid down by Hort in the first fourteen
paragraphs of his _Introduction_.[155] A necessary preliminary to this
is the study of genealogy, in which we have an excellent guide in
Ottokar Lorenz’s _Lehrbuch der gesamten wissenschaftlichen Genealogie_
(Berlin, 1898). See especially the first chapter of Part I. on the
distinction between Genealogical Tree (Table of genealogy) and Table of
Ancestors, and the third chapter of Part II. on the problem of Loss of
Ancestors.
All the ideas pertaining to the genealogy of living creatures, such as
crossing, heredity, and so forth, fall to be considered also in the
genealogy of manuscripts, the only difference being that in the latter
case new features make their appearance. It has been asserted somewhere
that if an Englishman, a Dutchman, a German, a Frenchman, and an
American meet in a company, the nationality of each is at once
recognisable, but it is impossible to determine their exact genealogical
relationships, and that the same impossibility exists in the case of the
manuscripts of the New Testament. That is perhaps an exaggeration, but
it is certainly a surprising fact that so few even of our latest
manuscripts can be proved with certainty to be copies of manuscripts
still in existence, or at least to be derived from a common original.
[Sidenote: Analogous works.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account