Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
Unfortunately very little definite information has come down to us from
those early times, and as that relates more to the history of the canon
than of the text, reference must be made here to the monumental work of
Zahn.[190] Two figures, however, emerge from this chaos who have left
their traces on the history of the text as well, =Tatian= and =Marcion=,
the former chiefly in connection with the Gospels, the latter with the
Pauline Epistles. Both have been already referred to more than once in
the chapter on the “Materials” (Tatian, p. 97 f.; Marcion, pp. 76, 87),
and both will require careful consideration here in our treatment of the
principles involved in the reconstruction of the text. How much would be
achieved could we but restore the original work of Tatian upon the
Gospels, or the _Gospel_ and the _Apostle_ of Marcion!
[Sidenote: Heretics.]
(_f_) Before speaking of their work, however, there are still a few less
important notices to be gleaned from their own and the preceding time.
Nearly all the =heretics= were in turn accused of falsifying the
Scriptures. In this sense, also, the Dutch proverb is true, “jedere
ketter heeft zijn letter” (every heretic has his letter, his text of the
Scriptures). In early times Justin charged the Jews with such
falsification in the Old Testament, and Lagarde was sometimes inclined
to suspect that the Massoretic numbers in Genesis had been manipulated
by the opponents of Christianity. Such complaints were most frequently
made against the Gnostics, particularly the Valentinians, and when we
glance over the long lists of apocryphal and pseudepigraphical
writings,[191] it is abundantly evident that at various times there was
a good deal of falsification—_i.e._, a good deal written under false
names. At the same time it cannot be denied that alterations were also
made on early Christian works and the books of Scripture in the
interests of dogma. These alterations are of all sorts, ranging from
quite harmless changes made in all innocence to supposed corrections,
and, it may be, even wilful corruptions.[192] But most assuredly the
heretics are not alone in being chargeable with this offence: Iliacos
intra muros peccatur et extra.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account