Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
(1) On a certain Sunday[194] in the year 170 or thereabouts,
Dionysius, Bishop of Corinth, wrote a letter to the Church at Rome
through their Bishop Soter, of which Eusebius has preserved the
following among other passages (_Eccl. Hist._, iv. 23):—Ἐπιστολὰς
γὰρ ἀδελφῶν ἀξιωσάντων με γράψαι ἔγραψα. Καὶ ταύτας οἱ τοῦ διαβόλου
ἀπόστολοι[195] ζιζανίων γεγέμικαν, ἃ μὲν ἐξαιροῦντες, ἃ δὲ
προστιθέντες. Οἷς τὸ οὐαὶ κεῖται.[196] Οὐ θαυμαστὸν ἄρα,[197] εἰ καὶ
τῶν Κυριακῶν ῥᾳδιουργῆσαί τινες ἐπιβέβληνται γραφῶν, ὁπότε καὶ ταῖς
οὐ τοιαύταις ἐπιβεβουλεύκασι. The κυριακαὶ γραφαὶ are in all
likelihood the Gospels (the Syriac renders “the writings of our
Lord”), but may also include the Pauline Epistles and the O.T. If we
are to take the words of Dionysius in their strict sense, it would
appear that these writings, like his own letters, had been corrupted
by means of “additions” and “omissions.” The last sentence, if it is
put correctly, and if it has been faithfully transmitted, leads us
to infer that in his letter to Corinth Soter had expressed his
surprise that the writings of the Lord should have been falsified.
To which Dionysius replies that certain letters of his own had been
falsified also, and that it was therefore no wonder if they did the
same to the writings of the Lord, seeing they tampered also (or,
_even_) with those that were inferior to them. The simplest
explanation of the words is, undoubtedly, that Dionysius sought to
console himself over the fate that had befallen his letters, by
reflecting that it was not surprising that they had falsified his
letters of less importance, seeing they had presumed to do the same
_even_ to the writings of the Lord. On the first interpretation, one
would certainly expect Dionysius to use a stronger expression to
describe his feelings at the manipulation of the sacred writings
than the mere οὐ θαυμαστόν. Who are meant by τινές? One most
naturally thinks of Marcion. According to a later account, Soter,
whom Jerome does not mention among the writers, composed a book
against the Montanists.
[Sidenote: Artemonites.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account