Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
In the arrangement of the books of the New Testament, it has become
customary to follow the order adopted by Tischendorf and Westcott and
Hort, who place the Catholic Epistles before the Pauline. In the
Stuttgart edition of the New Testament, however, I have, in accordance
with earlier usage, put the Pauline Epistles after the Gospels and Acts.
Considering what is said by Hort himself in § 422 of his _Introduction_,
and also what we find in No. 6 of Berger’s List of the various
arrangements of the books of the New Testament (_Histoire de la
Vulgate_, p. 339 f.), it might have been more correct to have put Paul
immediately after the Gospels, as in Codex Sinaiticus. But seeing that
the Latin and German Bibles at present exhibit the order, Gospels, Acts,
Pauline Epistles, Catholic Epistles, and that Meyer’s Commentary is also
arranged on this principle, I have retained this arrangement for the
sake of uniformity.
Here again I must refer the student for matters of detail to larger
works, especially to Zahn’s _Einleitung_. A few of the more important
passages will be considered in the sequel, but previously something may
be said here of the origin and circulation of the collective writings of
Paul.
1. Paul, accompanied by Silvanus and Timothy, came from Philippi to
Thessalonica on his second missionary journey, somewhere about the year
54, though Harnack puts it as early as 49-50. There he gathered together
a church in the short space of three or four weeks, if we may credit the
account given in Acts xvii. 2 in this particular. At all events he was
not long there. Disturbances similar to those in Philippi arose, which
compelled him to leave the city. He came to Athens. In his anxiety over
the internal and external circumstances of the newly-founded church at
Thessalonica, he sent back Timothy from Athens to confirm those he had
left behind. When his messenger returned he wrote to the Thessalonian
Church, in all probability not from Athens but from Corinth, where he
had gone in the interval of Timothy’s absence. This letter we know as
the First Epistle to the Thessalonians. It is uncertain whether the
apostle, as in most other cases, dictated the epistle, writing only the
salutation and concluding benediction with his own hand (compare 2
Thess. iii. 17: ὁ ἀσπασμὸς τῇ ἐμῇ χειρὶ Παύλου, ὅ ἐστιν σημεῖον ἐν πάσῃ
ἐπιστολῇ· οὕτως γράφω),[280] or whether he wrote it all himself in large
letters, as he did in the case of the Epistle to the Galatians which he
wrote πηλίκοις γράμμασι (Gal. vi. 11), either on account of some
affection of the eyes or because he was a craftsman and had little
practice in writing. The epistle was intended for the entire church at
Thessalonica, of which Aristarchus, Secundus, and perhaps also Gaius
(see above, on Acts xx. 4), are known to us by name. It was probably
addressed to the oldest, or most prominent, or most active member of the
Christian community. At the close of the epistle, the writer expressly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account