Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
In Codex D seven cases of this variation occur in Acts alone—viz. iv.
20, v. 26, 28, vii. 25, xix. 40, xx. 20, 27. Compare, further, Matt.
xii. 32, where in place of ἀφεθήσεται B* reads οὐκ ἀφεθήσεται. In Matt.
xvii. 25 one Latin manuscript makes Peter say “utique non” in answer to
the question, “Doth not your master pay tribute?” We have in Matt. xxi.
16, ἀκούεις and οὐκ ἀκούεις; xxi. 32, μετεμελήθητε and οὐ μετεμελήθητε;
xxiv. 2, οὐ βλέπετε and βλέπετε. In Mark viii. 14, οὐκ εἶχον and εἶχον;
xiii. 19, καὶ οὐ μὴ, οὐδὲ μὴ and οὐδ’ οὐ. Luke xi. 48, συνευδοκεῖτε: μὴ
συνευδοκεῖτε; xxi. 21, ἐκχωρείτωσαν: μὴ ἐκχωρείτωσαν. John ii. 12, οὐ
πολλὰς: πολλὰς; xv. 19, οὐκ ἐστὲ: ἦτε; xx. 8, ἐπίστευσεν: οὐκ
ἐπίστευσεν. Acts xxv. 6, πλείους: οὐ πλείους. Rom. iv. 5, μὴ ἐργαζομένῳ:
ἐργαζομένῳ (_Studia Sinaitica_, vi. p. lxvi); x. 3, οὐχ ὑπετάγησαν:
ὑπετάγησαν (_ibid._). 1 Cor i. 19, συνετῶν: ἀσυνέτων; iv. 6, ἵνα μὴ:
ἵνα; iv. 19, οὐ τὸν λόγον: τὸν λόγον; vi. 5, οὐδεὶς σοφὸς: σοφὸς; vi. 9,
οὐ κληρονομήσουσιν: κληρονομήσουσιν (B* 93) and _vice versa_ in verse
10. 2 Cor. v. 1, ἀχειροποίητος: οὐκ ἀχειροποίητος (_non manufactam_).
Gal. iv. 14, οὐκ ἐξουθενήσατε: ἐξουθενήσατε (א*). Heb. x. 2, οὐκ ἂν: ἂν:
κἂν. 2 Pet. i. 12, μελλήσω: οὐκ ἀμελήσω: οὐ μελλήσω. 1 John v. 17, οὐ
πρὸς θάνατον: πρὸς θάνατον. Apoc. iii. 8, μικρὰν: οὐ μικρὰν.[284]
ii. 20. Tischendorf fails to mention that Marcion read ἀγοράσαντος
(redemit) in place of ἀγαπήσαντος. The variant is of sufficient
importance to justify a reference to Zahn, _GK._ ii. 499. I cannot at
this moment recall any instance of a confusion between ἀγοράσας and
ἀγαπήσας, though it is not an unlikely mistake to make. In Leviticus
xxvii. 19, the first hand of B by mistake wrote ἀγοράσας for ἁγιάσας.
v. 9. Epiphanius accused Marcion of having altered ζυμοῖ to δολοῖ. See
Zahn, _GK._ i. 639; ii. 503. _Cf._ above, p. 76.
Ephesians.
Tertullian says (_Adv. Marcionem_, v. 17): Ecclesiae quidem veritate
epistulam istam ad Ephesios habemus emissam, non ad Laodicenos, sed
Marcion ei titulum aliquando interpolare gestiit, quasi et in isto
diligentissimus explorator. Nihil autem de titulis interest, cum ad
omnes apostolus scripserit, dum ad quosdam.
iv. 19. For ἀπηλγηκότες D here reads ἀπηλπικότες. A glance at
ΑΠΗΛΓΗΚΟΤΕϹ and ΑΠΗΛΠΙΚΟΤΕϹ will show how easy it was to make such a
mistake in the days of uncial script.
v. 14. The reading ἐπιψαύσεις τοῦ Χριστοῦ is attested by D*, some Latin
manuscripts, and Theodore of Mopsuestia. See above, p. 254.
Subscription: ἐγράφη ἀπὸ Ῥώμης: + διὰ Τυχίκου.
Philippians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account