Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
Most manuscripts show two =columns= to the page. The Sinaitic, however,
has four, while the Vatican has three. Columns vary considerably in
width. They may be the width of a few letters only, or of an average
hexameter line of sixteen to eighteen syllables or about thirty-six
letters. Such a line is called a στίχος, and as the scribe was paid
according to the number of στίχοι, we find at the end of several books a
note giving the total number of στίχοι contained in them. In carefully
written manuscripts, every hundredth, sometimes every fiftieth στίχος is
indicated in the margin. These stichometric additions were afterwards
adopted for the entire Bible. Their value in many respects will be
obvious.
As the church increased in wealth and prestige, New Testament
manuscripts acquired a more sumptuous form, either from the luxury of
the rich or the pious devotion of kings and churches.
[Sidenote: Palimpsests.]
Parchment, however, grew more and more expensive, and so the practice
arose of using an old manuscript a second time. The original writing was
erased by means of a sponge or pumice stone or a knife, and the sheets
were then employed to receive other matter, or it might even be the same
matter over again. And so we have =Codices Rescripti= or =Palimpsesti=
as they were called, a term known to Cicero, who says, though of a wax
tablet, “quod in palimpsesto, laudo parsimoniam” (_ad Diversos_ vii.
18). Some manuscripts were used as often as three times for distinct
works in three different languages _e.g._ Greek, Syriac, and Iberian.
Codex I^b is one of these thrice used manuscripts, being written first
in Greek and then twice in Syriac.
[Sidenote: Punctuation.]
Marks of =punctuation= are hardly to be found in the earliest times. It
was frequently, therefore, a question with church teachers whether a
sentence was to be taken interrogatively or indicatively, or how the
sentences were to be divided, as in the case of John i. 3 and 4. In the
general absence of punctuation, the appearance of quotation marks in
some of the oldest manuscripts, like Codex Vaticanus _e.g._, to indicate
citations from the Old Testament, is remarkable.
[Sidenote: Size.]
The =size= of a manuscript varies from a large folio, which in the case
of a parchment codex must have been very expensive, to a small octavo.
In regions inhabited by a mixed population we find =bilingual=
manuscripts, Greek-Latin, Greek-Coptic, Greek-Armenian, and such like.
If the manuscript was designed for use in church, the two languages were
written in parallel columns, the Greek frequently occupying the left
column or reverse side of the sheet, being the place of honour. In
manuscripts intended for use in schools, the translation was written
between the lines. Codex Δ is an example of a manuscript with an
interlinear version of this sort.
[Sidenote: Contents.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account