Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
A further consideration is emphasised by means of these papyrus
discoveries—viz. that =no distinction of time= can be drawn between the
uncial and cursive hands found in the manuscripts. Even in the very
earliest documents the hand of common life displays a very cursive
character, and a fairly cursive uncial hand with ligatures is not
necessarily later than an uncial hand without ligatures. It is somewhat
different in the case of writing on parchment: here the old distinction
of uncial and minuscule manuscripts is rightly maintained, only we must
guard against supposing that the minuscule hand and the cursive are
quite the same thing; nor must we forget that for a considerable time
the older uncial and the later minuscule scripts were in use
together.[75] The sharp line of demarcation, therefore, which has
hitherto been drawn in the textual criticism of the New Testament
between these two classes of manuscripts has no real justification in
fact. The present account, however, is intended merely as a survey of
the position of things up to the present, and the following description
of the minuscules is subject to that limitation.
(_b._) SOME OF THE MORE IMPORTANT MINUSCULES.
[Sidenote: Minuscules.]
When the Greek New Testament began to be printed, the editors had
necessarily to be content with indifferent and late minuscules, and even
those who followed them, like Bentley and Lachmann, thought they were at
liberty to disregard these altogether and to found their text
exclusively on the oldest uncials. They forgot that the text of a late
manuscript may be derived from a very early and good source through
comparatively few intermediaries, and that it is possible to reconstruct
a lost original by means of a comparison of several witnesses.
Accordingly, in more recent times, English editors like Tregelles,
Burgon, Ferrar, Hoskier, and Scrivener have rendered great service in
the way of collating manuscripts, and the last-mentioned as well as
Gregory in Germany has also catalogued them. At the present moment a
systematic investigation in this department is being carried on in
Berlin. Most of the minuscules are still written on parchment which
began to be mixed with paper in the ninth century, and was ultimately
superseded by it. Various minuscules contain commentaries and other
additional matter, such as the List of the Seventy Apostles, short
Biographies of the Apostles, Summaries of the journeys of St. Paul, or
notes as to the date and place of the composition of the different
books. When dates are given in the manuscripts, they are still as a rule
computed in the Byzantine manner, reckoning from the Creation of the
world (5508 B.C.). In only a few cursives is the date reckoned from the
Birth of Christ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account