Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
ff_{1}. Corbeiensis I., contains the Gospel according to Matthew alone.
The manuscript formerly belonged to the Monastery of Corbey, near
Amiens, and with others was transferred to St. Petersburg during the
French Revolution.
ff_{2}. Corbeiensis II., written in the sixth century and now in Paris:
contains the Gospels with several lacunæ.
On Belsheim’s editions of ff_{1} and ff_{2} (1881 and 1887), see E.
Ranke in the _ThLz._, 1887, col. 566, and S. Berger, _Bull. Crit._,
1891, 302 f.
g_{1}. Sangermanensis I., of the ninth century, in Paris, exhibits a
mixed text. The manuscript was used by Stephen for his Latin Bible of
1538.
g_{2}. Sangermanensis II., written in an Irish hand of the tenth
century, has a mixed text: in Paris (Lat. 13069).
h. Claromontanus, of the fourth or fifth century, now in the Vatican:
has the Old Latin text in Matthew only. The manuscript is defective at
the beginning down to Matt. iii. 15 and also from Matt. xiv. 33-xviii.
12.
Edited by Mai in his _Scriptorum Veterum Nova Collectio_, iii.
257-288, and by Belsheim, Christiania, 1892.
i. Vindobonensis, of the seventh century, contains fragments of Luke and
Mark written on purple with silver and gold.
Edited by Belsheim, _Codex Vindobonensis membranaceus purpureus ...
antiquissimae evangeliorum Lucae et Marci translationis Latinae
fragmenta edidit Jo. Belsheim_. Lipsiae, 1885 (cum tabula).
j (z in _TiGr._). Saretianus or Sarzannensis, of the fifth century,
contains 292 verses from John written on purple. The manuscript was
discovered in 1872 in the Church of Sarezzano, near Tortona, and is not
yet completely edited.
Compare G. Amelli, _Un antichissimo codice biblico Latino purpureo
conservato nella chiesa di Sarezzano presso Tortona_. Milan, 1872.
k. Bobiensis, of the fifth century, is perhaps the most important of the
Old Latin manuscripts, but unfortunately contains only fragments of
Matthew and Mark. It is said to have belonged to St. Columban, the
founder of the monastery of Bobbio, who died in the year 615. It is now
preserved at Turin. See Burkitt on Mark xv. 34 in Codex Bobiensis in the
_Journal of Theological Studies_, i. 2 (Jan. 1900), p. 278 f.
l. Rehdigeranus, in Breslau, purchased in Venice by Thomas von Rehdiger
in 1569. Matthew i. 1-ii. 15 and a good deal of John wanting.
Edited by H. Fr. Haase, Breslau, 1865, 1866: _Evangeliorum quattuor
vetus latina interpretatio ex codice Rehdigerano nunc primum edita_.
m. Does not represent any particular manuscript and should properly be
omitted here. It indicates the _Liber de divinis scripturis sive
Speculum_, a work mistakenly ascribed to Augustine, consisting of a
collection of proof-passages (testimonia) from the Old and New
Testaments. All the books of the latter are made use of except Philemon,
Hebrews, and 3 John, but the Epistle to the Laodicæans is cited among
the number.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account