Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
detect in their own minds the exact opposite of such a wish as is
interpreted to them, and when they can prove to us by their whole
conduct in life that the contrary desire predominates, surely we must be
nonplussed. Is it not about time now for us to discard our whole work of
dream-interpretation as something which has led to a _reductio ad
absurdum_?
No, not even now. Even this stronger argument falls to pieces when
subjected to a critical attack. Assuming that unconscious tendencies do
exist in mental life, the fact that the opposite tendencies predominate
in conscious life goes to prove nothing. Perhaps there is room in the
mind for opposite tendencies, for contradictions, existing side by side;
indeed, possibly the very predominance of the one tendency conditions
the unconscious nature of the opposite. So the first objections raised
only amount to the statement that the results of dream-interpretation
are not simple and are very disagreeable. To the first charge we may
reply that, however much enamoured of simplicity you may be, you cannot
thereby solve one of the problems of dreams; you have to make up your
mind at the outset to accept the fact of complicated relations. And, as
regards the second point, you are manifestly wrong in taking the fact
that something pleases or repels yourself as the motive for a scientific
judgement. What does it matter if you do find the results of
dream-interpretation unpleasant, or even mortifying and repulsive? _Ça
n’empêche pas d’exister_—as I, when a young doctor, heard my chief,
Charcot, say in a similar case. We must be humble and put sympathies and
antipathies honourably in the background if we would learn to know
reality in this world. If a physicist could prove to you that organic
life on the earth was bound to become extinct before long, would you
venture to say to him also: “That cannot be so; I dislike the prospect
too much.” I think you would say nothing, until another physicist came
along and convicted the first of a mistake in his premises or his
calculations. If you repudiate whatever is distasteful to you, you are
repeating the mechanism of a dream structure rather than understanding
and mastering it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account