Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
Besides, we are still not nearly far enough advanced to allow ourselves
to be outraged at the result of our work of interpretation. I think we
still do not understand it properly; but first of all it is incumbent
upon us to secure it against certain possible attacks. It is not at all
difficult to detect weak points in it. Our interpretations were based on
hypotheses which we adopted earlier: that there really is some meaning
in dreams; that the idea of mental processes being unconscious for a
time, which was first arrived at through hypnotic sleep, may be applied
also to normal sleep; and that all associations are subject to
determination. Now if, reasoning from these hypotheses, we had obtained
plausible results in our dream-interpretation we should have been
justified in concluding that these hypotheses were correct. But what if
these discoveries are of the kind I have described? In that case, surely
it seems natural to say: “These results are impossible, absurd, at the
very least highly improbable, so there must have been something wrong
about the hypotheses. Either the dream is after all not a mental
phenomenon, or there is nothing which is unconscious in our normal
condition, or there is a flaw somewhere in our technique. Is it not
simpler and more satisfactory to assume this than to accept all the
abominable conclusions which we profess to have deduced from our
hypotheses?”
Both! it is both simpler and more satisfactory, but not on that account
necessarily more correct. Let us give ourselves time: the matter is not
yet ripe for judgement. First of all, we can make the case against our
interpretations even stronger. The fact that our results are so
unpleasant and repellent would not perhaps weigh so very heavily with
us; a stronger argument is the emphatic and well-grounded repudiation by
dreamers of the wish-tendencies which we try to foist upon them after
interpretating their dreams. “What?” says one, “You want to prove to me
from my dream that I grudge the money I have spent on my sister’s dowry
and my brother’s education? But it is out of the question; I spend my
whole time working for my brothers and sisters and my only interest in
life is to do my duty by them, as, being the eldest, I promised our dead
mother I would.” Or a woman says: “I am supposed to wish that my husband
were dead? Really that is outrageous nonsense! Not only is our married
life very happy, though perhaps you won’t believe that, but if he died I
should lose everything I possess in the world.” Or someone else will
reply: “Do you mean to suggest that I entertain sexual desires towards
my sister? The thing is ludicrous; she is nothing to me; we get on badly
with one another, and for years I have not exchanged a word with her.”
We still might not be much impressed if these dreamers neither admitted
nor denied the tendencies attributed to them; we might say that these
are just the things of which they are quite unconscious. But when they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account