Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
This relationship is no doubt a more favourable one, also from the
children’s point of view; and this too is what our expectations require:
we find it far more offensive for love to be lacking between parents and
children than between brothers and sisters. We have, so to speak,
sanctified the former love while allowing the latter to remain profane.
Yet everyday observation may show us how frequently the sentiments
entertained towards each other by parents and grown-up children fall
short of the ideal set up by society, and how much hostility lies
smouldering, ready to burst into flame if it were not stifled by
considerations of filial or parental duty and by other, tender impulses.
The motives for this hostility are well known, and we recognize a
tendency for those of the same sex to become alienated, daughter from
mother and father from son. The daughter sees in her mother the
authority which imposes limits to her will, whose task it is to bring
her to that renunciation of sexual freedom which society demands; in
certain cases, too, the mother is still a rival, who objects to being
set aside. The same thing is repeated still more blatantly between
father and son. To the son the father is the embodiment of the social
compulsion to which he so unwillingly submits, the person who stands in
the way of his following his own will, of his early sexual pleasures
and, when there is family property, of his enjoyment of it. When a
throne is involved this impatience for the death of the father may
approach tragic intensity. The relation between father and daughter or
mother and son would seem less liable to disaster; the latter relation
furnishes the purest examples of unchanging tenderness, undisturbed by
any egoistic considerations.
Why, you ask, do I speak of things so banal and so well-known to
everybody? Because there exists an unmistakable tendency in people’s
minds to deny the significance of these things in real life and to
pretend that the social ideal is much more frequently realized than it
actually is. But it is better that psychology should tell the truth than
that it should be left to cynics to do so. This general denial is only
applied to real life, it is true; for fiction and drama are free to make
use of the motives laid bare when these ideals are rudely disturbed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account