Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
situation which had just been reached in the treatment gave good
grounds for the suspicion that a carefully-suppressed critical
antagonism to her much loved and honoured father had played a part in
this dream. Following out her further associations, apparently quite
remote from the dream, she told how she had heard a long discussion of
psychological questions on the day before and a relative had said:
“Primitive man (_Urmensch_) survives in all of us.” Now a light dawns
on us. Here was again a splendid opportunity for her to imagine that
her dead father survived, and so in the dream she made him a
“clock-man” (_Uhrmensch_), telling the quarters up to the time of the
midday meal.
The likeness to a pun in this cannot be ignored, and as a matter of fact
it has often happened that a dreamer’s pun has been ascribed to the
interpreter; there are yet other examples in which it is not at all easy
to decide whether we are dealing with a joke or a dream. But you will
remember that the same sort of doubt arose with some slips of the
tongue. A man related as a dream that he and his uncle were sitting in
the latter’s _auto_ (automobile) and his uncle kissed him. The dreamer
himself instantly volunteered the interpretation: it meant
“_auto-erotism_” (a term used in our theory of the libido, signifying
gratification obtained without any external love-object). Now was this
man allowing himself a joke at our expense and pretending that a pun
which occurred to him was part of a dream? I do not think so: he really
did dream it. But where does this bewildering resemblance between dreams
and jokes come from? At one time this question took me somewhat out of
my way, for it necessitated my making a thorough investigation into the
question of wit itself. This led to the conclusion that wit originates
as follows: a preconscious train of thought is for a moment left to a
process of unconscious elaboration, from which it emerges in the form of
a witticism. While under the influence of the unconscious it is subject
to the mechanisms there operative—to condensation and displacement; that
is to say, to the same processes as we found at work in the dream-work;
and the similarity sometimes found between dreams and wit is to be
ascribed to this character common to both. But the unintentional “dream
joke” does not amuse us as does an ordinary witticism; a deeper study of
wit may show you why this is so. The “dream joke” strikes us as a poor
form of wit; it does not make us laugh, it leaves us cold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account