Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
So now we will leave the analysis of errors. But there is one thing more
which I might impress upon you: to keep in mind, as a model, the method
by which we have studied these phenomena. You can perceive from these
examples what the aim of our psychology is. Our purpose is not merely to
describe and classify the phenomena, but to conceive them as brought
about by the play of forces in the mind, as expressions of tendencies
striving towards a goal, which work together or against one another. We
are endeavouring to attain a _dynamic conception_ of mental phenomena.
In this conception, the trends we merely infer are more prominent than
the phenomena we perceive.
So we will probe no further into errors; but we may still take a
fleeting glimpse over the breadth of this whole field, in the course of
which we shall both meet with things already known and come upon the
tracks of others that are new. In so doing, we will keep to the division
into three groups of slips of the tongue, made at the beginning of our
study, together with the co-ordinate forms of slips of the pen,
misreading, mis-hearing; of forgetting with its subdivisions according
to the object forgotten (proper names, foreign words, resolutions,
impressions); and of mislaying, mistaking, and losing, objects.
Mistakes, in so far as they concern us, are to be grouped partly under
the head of forgetting, partly under acts erroneously performed (picking
up the wrong objects, etc.).
We have already treated slips of the tongue in great detail, yet there
is still something to add. There are certain small affective
manifestations related to slips of the tongue which are not entirely
without interest. No one likes to think he has made a slip of the
tongue; one often fails to hear it when made by oneself, but never when
made by someone else. Slips of the tongue are in a certain sense
infectious; it is not at all easy to speak of them without making them
oneself. It is not hard to detect the motivation of even the most
trifling forms of them, although these do not throw any particular light
on hidden mental processes. If, for instance, anyone pronounces a long
vowel as a short one, in consequence of a disturbance over the word, no
matter how motivated, he will as a result soon after lengthen a short
vowel and commit a new slip in compensation for the first. The same
thing occurs if anyone pronounces a diphthong indistinctly and
carelessly, for instance, “ew” or “oy” as “i”; he tries to correct it by
changing a subsequent “i” into “ew” or “oy.” Some consideration relating
to the hearer seems to be behind this behaviour, as though he were not
to be allowed to think that the speaker is indifferent how he treats his
mother-tongue. The second, compensating distortion actually has the
purpose of drawing the hearer’s attention to the first and assuring him
that it has not escaped the speaker either. The most frequent,
insignificant, and simple forms of slips consist in contractions and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account