Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
(_b_) A sceptical patient had a longer dream, in which certain people
were telling her about my book on _Wit_ and praising it very highly.
Then something else came in about a _canal; it might have been another
book in which the word canal occurred, or something else to do with a
canal ... she did not know ... it was quite vague_.
Now you will certainly be inclined to suppose that the _canal_ in the
dream will defy interpretation on account of its vagueness. You are
right in expecting difficulty, but the difficulty is not caused by the
vagueness; on the contrary, the difficulty in interpretation is caused
by something else, by the same thing that makes the element vague. The
dreamer had no association to the word “canal”; naturally I did not know
what to say either. Shortly afterwards, to be accurate, on the next day,
she told me that an association had occurred to her which _perhaps_ had
something to do with it. It was in fact a witty remark which some one
had told her. On board ship between Dover and Calais a well-known author
was talking to an Englishman who in some particular context quoted the
words: “Du sublime au ridicule il n’y a qu’un pas.” The author answered:
“Oui, le Pas-de-Calais,” meaning that he regarded France as sublime and
England as ridiculous. Of course, the Pas-de-Calais is a _canal_—that is
to say, the Canal la Manche—the English Channel. Now, you ask, do I
think that this association had anything to do with the dream? Certainly
I think so: it gives the true meaning of the puzzling dream-element. Or
are you inclined to doubt that the joke already existed before the dream
and was the unconscious thought behind the element “canal,” and to
maintain that it was a subsequent invention? The association reveals the
scepticism disguised under the obtrusive admiration, and resistance was
no doubt the cause both of the association being so long in occurring to
her, and of the corresponding dream-element being so vague. Observe here
the relation between the dream-element and the unconscious thought
underlying it: it is, as it were, a fragment of the thought, an allusion
to it; by being isolated in that way it became quite incomprehensible.
(_c_) A patient had a fairly long dream, part of which was as follows:
_Several members of his family were seated at a table of a particular
shape_ ... etc. This table reminded the dreamer that he had seen one of
the same sort when he was visiting a certain family. From that his
thoughts ran on thus: in this family the relationship between father and
son was a peculiar one, and the patient presently added that his own
relationship to his father was, as a matter of fact, of the same nature.
So the table was introduced into the dream to indicate this parallelism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account