Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of ViennaFreud, Sigmund
Science
Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis : $b a course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis
4. The child’s dream is a reaction to an experience of the previous day,
which has left behind a regret, a longing, or an unsatisfied wish. _In
the dream we have the direct, undisguised fulfilment of this wish._ Now
consider our discussion as to the part played by the external or
internal somatic stimuli as disturbers of sleep and begetters of dreams.
We learnt certain quite definite facts on this point, but this
explanation only held good in a small number of dreams. In these
children’s dreams there is nothing to indicate the influence of such
somatic stimuli; we can make no mistake about it, for the dreams are
perfectly comprehensible and each can easily be grasped as a whole. But
we need not on that account give up our notion of the stimulus as
causing the dream. We can only ask why we forget from the outset that
there are _mental_ as well as bodily sleep-disturbing stimuli; surely we
know that it is these which are mainly responsible for disturbing the
sleep of the grown-up person, in that they hinder him from bringing
about in himself the mental condition essential for sleep, i.e. the
withdrawal of interest from the outside world. He wishes not to have any
interruption in his life; he would prefer to continue working at
whatever occupies him, and that is the reason why he does not sleep. The
mental stimulus which disturbs sleep is therefore for a child the
unsatisfied wish, and his reaction to this is a dream.
5. This takes us by a very short step to a conclusion about the function
of dreams. If dreams are the reaction to a mental stimulus their value
must lie in effecting a discharge of the excitation so that the stimulus
is removed and sleep can continue. We do not yet know how this discharge
through the dream is effected dynamically, but we notice already that
dreams are not disturbers of sleep (the accusation commonly brought
against them), but are guardians and deliverers of it from disturbing
influences. True, we are apt to think we should have slept better if we
had not dreamed, but there we are wrong: the truth is that without the
help of the dream we should not have slept at all, and we owe it to the
dream that we slept as well as we did. It could not help disturbing us a
little, just as a policeman often cannot avoid making a noise when
driving off disturbers of the peace who would wake us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account