Introductory notes on lying-in institutions : $b Together with a proposal for organising an institution for training midwives and midwifery nursesNightingale, Florence
Science
Introductory notes on lying-in institutions : $b Together with a proposal for organising an institution for training midwives and midwifery nurses
Nightingale, Florence
Women's hospitals
Dr. Le Fort also cites a number of interesting facts, showing that the
indiscriminate visiting by attendants of lying-in women and patients
suffering from disease, either within or outside the same establishment,
has been a means of exciting puerperal fever action.
_Admission of Students._—It is one of the contingencies necessarily due
to connecting together the teaching of midwifery to students, with other
portions of clinical instruction, that no precautions can prevent a
student passing from a bad surgical case, or from an anatomical theatre,
to the bedside of a lying-in woman, while sad experience has proved that
the most fatal results may ensue from this circumstance.
Of course risks of this kind are greatly increased when there are
lying-in wards in general hospitals—especially if a medical school be
attached to such a hospital.
This risk had not been overlooked in the arrangements for the lying-in
wards at King’s College Hospital, under which, while intended solely for
the training of midwifery nurses, provision was made for a limited and
regulated attendance of students; but, when enquiries came to be made
into the probable cause of the high death-rates, it was found that the
restrictions laid down as to the admission of students had been
disregarded; also that there was a post-mortem theatre almost under the
ward windows.
_Effect of Numbers._—Dr. Le Fort has examined the influence exercised by
numbers—or, in other words, by the size of hospitals—on the mortality
after childbirth. His general results may be briefly stated as follows:—
In hospitals receiving annually more than 2,000 lying-in cases,
comprising the two Cliniques of Vienna, 1834–63; the Maternités of
Paris, 1849–59; of Prague, 1848–62; and of Moscow, 1853–62; and the
Lying-in Hospital of Dublin, 1847–54, the death-rate is 40·7 per 1,000.
In hospitals receiving between 1,000 and 2,000 cases a year, including
the Enfans Trouvés at Petersburg, 1845–59; the Maternité at Munich,
1859–62, and other places, the death-rate is 36 per 1,000.
In hospitals receiving from 500 to 1,000 cases a year, including Pesth
and the Maternité of Dresden, the death-rate is nearly 27 per 1,000.
In hospitals where the number of deliveries is between 200 and 500 per
annum, comprehending several places cited, among the rest Edinburgh and
the London Lying-in Hospital, 1833–60, the death-rate is 30½ per 1,000.
In hospitals receiving between 100 and 200 cases, as at Frankfort and
Göttingen, the death-rate is 27·6 per 1,000.
And in three small establishments receiving fewer than 100 a year, as at
Lund, the death-rate is above 83½ per 1,000.
From these facts Dr. Le Fort concludes that the relative mortality in
small and large establishments is not favourable to small hospitals,
_per se_. The benefit of subdivision may be neutralised by other
circumstances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account