Introductory notes on lying-in institutions : $b Together with a proposal for organising an institution for training midwives and midwifery nursesNightingale, Florence
Science
Introductory notes on lying-in institutions : $b Together with a proposal for organising an institution for training midwives and midwifery nurses
Nightingale, Florence
Women's hospitals
In the Colchester Hut the patient is received into a separate
compartment, of which there are four, where she is delivered and remains
until discharged to quarters.
It is very rarely indeed, if ever, that all the four compartments are
occupied simultaneously. The average stay is ten days; the average
number of deliveries a year under 50.
This hut does not form part of a hospital. It is a separate
establishment, solely for lying-in women, as such accommodation should
always be.
_Note._—There is another reason, though it may be termed a fanciful one,
for altogether disconnecting lying-in institutions with general
hospitals, and even with the name and idea of hospital. It is this:
there must be a certain death-rate in a general hospital, receiving as
it does fatal diseases and fatal accidents, as long as men and women
have fatal diseases and fatal accidents.
But lying-in is not a fatal disease, nor a disease at all. It is not a
fatal accident, nor an accident at all.
Unless from causes unconnected with the puerperal state, no woman ought
to die in her lying-in; and there ought, in a lying-in institution, to
be no death-rate at all.
It is dangerously deadening our senses to this fact—viz., that there
ought to be _no_ deaths in a lying-in institution—if we connect it in
the least degree with the name of hospital, so long as a hospital means
a place for the reception of diseases and accidents.
In French statistics, this confusion of ideas, were it not ghastly,
would be ludicrous. ‘Admissions,’ under the head ‘Malades,’ include not
only the lying-in women, but the new-born infants, which appear to be
‘admitted’ to life and to hospital together, as if life were synonymous
with disease, so that, e.g. 4,000 ‘Admissions,’ in such a year, to the
Paris Maternité would mean 2,000 deliveries, 2,000 births—[and—how many
deaths?]
_RECAPITULATION._
In summing up the evidence regarding excessive mortality in lying-in
institutions and its causes, it appears:—
1. That, making every allowance for unavoidable inaccuracies in
statistics of midwifery practice, there is sufficient evidence to show
that in lying-in wards there reigns a death-rate many times the amount
of that which takes place in home deliveries.
2. That a great cause of mortality in these establishments is
‘blood-poisoning,’ and that this arises from the greater susceptibility
of lying-in women to diseases connected with this cause. From whence it
follows that in many lying-in wards, as at present arranged and managed,
there must be conditions and circumstances apart from those belonging to
the inmates personally, which aid in the development of this morbid
state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account