Inventions of the Great WarBond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
History
Inventions of the Great War
Bond, A. Russell (Alexander Russell)
Inventions; World War, 1914-1918 -- Technology
The British had another scheme for locking the mechanism until after
the grenade had traveled some distance through the air. Details of this
grenade, which was of the type adopted to be fired from a rifle, are
shown in Fig. 6. The striker _A_ is retained by a couple of bolts, _B_,
which in turn are held in place by a sleeve, _C_. On the sleeve is a
set of wind-vanes, _D_. As the grenade travels through the air, the
wind-vanes cause the sleeve _C_ to revolve, screwing it down clear of
the bolts _B_, which then drop out, permitting the pin _A_ to strike
the detonator _E_ upon impact of the grenade with its target.
[Illustration: FIG. 7. Front, side, and sectional views of a
disk-shaped German grenade]
[Illustration: FIG. 8. A curious German hand grenade shaped like a hair
brush]
The Germans had one peculiar type which was in the shape of a disk. In
the disk were six tubes, four of which carried percussion caps so that
the grenade was sure to explode no matter on which tube it fell. The
disk was thrown with the edge up, and it would roll through the air.
Another type of grenade was known as the hair-brush grenade because it
had a rectangular body of tin about six inches long and two and three
quarter inches wide and deep, which was nailed to a wooden handle.
MINIATURE ARTILLERY
Hand-artillery was very effective as far as it went, but it had its
limitations. Grenades could not be made heavier than two pounds in
weight if they were to be thrown by hand; in fact, most of them were
much lighter than that. If they were fired from a rifle, the range was
increased but the missile could not be made very much heavier. TNT is
a very powerful explosive, but there is not room for much of it in a
grenade the size of a large lemon. Trench fighting was a duel between
forts, and while the hand-artillery provided a means of attacking the
defenders of a fort, it made no impression on the walls of the fort.
It corresponded to shrapnel fire on a miniature scale, and something
corresponding to high-explosive fire on a small scale was necessary
if the opposing fortifications were to be destroyed. To meet this
problem, men cast their thoughts back to the primitive artillery of
the Romans, who used to hurl great rocks at the enemy with catapults.
And the trench fighters actually rigged up catapults with which
they hurled heavy bombs at the enemy lines. All sorts of ingenious
catapults were built, some modeled after the old Roman machines. In
some of these stout timbers were used as springs, in others there were
powerful coil springs. It was not necessary to cast the bombs far. For
distant work the regular artillery could be used. What was needed was a
short-distance gun for heavy missiles and that is what the catapult was.
[Illustration: Press Illustrating Service
A 3-inch Stokes mortar and two of its shells]
[Illustration: Press Illustrating Service
Dropping a shell into a 6-inch trench mortar]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account