Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1 — John Shaqi
Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
I had been reading the Daily Worker. I had been reading the Butte Daily
Bulletin. I was somewhat familiar with the international politics
in which there was conflicting interest between the United States
and the Soviet Union. But it was reconciled in my thinking with the
firm conviction that the Communist Party was attempting to serve the
interests of the working class all over the world and that in doing so
there would be no conflict so far as we were concerned. Now that was
the way it was resolved in my mind at that time.
Mr. VELDE. I think that is true of many early Communist Party
members.
Mr. TAVENNER. Without going into detail, did your views
continue to be the same or were they altered as time went on in the
course of your Communist Party work?
Mr. DENNETT. It didn’t take very long after I reached Seattle
before I had my first rude awakening. I was naive enough to believe
that it was proper for anyone to ask any question at any time in a
party meeting. But after coming to Seattle and being assigned as the
district agitprop director, believing that my duty required that I
should supervise the production of leaflets and propaganda which was
being issued, I was naive enough to ask what were my various duties.
And the answer I got from Mr. Noral was to the effect that anybody
knows what that is, which left me completely in the dark.
So I turned to the nearest associate who, at that time was Mr. John
Lawrie, Sr., who more or less agreed with me that it was time to get
some clear definition as to what the function was. Later on when I
insisted upon criticizing a leaflet which Noral had issued he accused
me of being some kind of a deviationist. I had only been in the party
about 3 months. I didn’t know what the term meant.
Later on he accused me of being a Trotskyite. I think he used the
term “Trotskyite,” which was a term of derision. And that conflict
led ultimately to my being removed as district agitprop director. As
a matter of fact, if Noral had carried out his wishes at that time I
would have been liquidated.
I didn’t know what he meant by liquidation then, and I think the term
was used rather loosely. But he did declare that liquidation was the
proper thing to do with deviators such as I at that time.
However, there was another leader in the district by the name of Ed
Leavitt, L-e-a-v-i-t-t, who was the organizational secretary, and
Leavitt felt that it was improper to deal with me in that fashion,
and he felt that since I was a young man at that time that I should
be given an opportunity to prove my worth and prove myself. And he
prevailed upon the district secretariat, namely, himself, Noral, and
Lawrie, to assign me to section organizer in Bellingham. It wasn’t very
long before I was banished from the district headquarters and sent to
Bellingham to prove myself, which I think I did.
Mr. MOULDER. Were you then being compensated?
Mr. DENNETT. No, sir.
Mr. MOULDER. Or reimbursed for your travels?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account