Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
Mr. VELDE. The chairman gave you a great privilege by allowing
you to answer the question “Yes” or “No,” and then by giving you the
right to spout off about our rules and regulations, which we know very
well. And we know about the Constitution.
Now it seems to me that any person who is interested in preserving the
Constitution against encroachment from our prospective enemies would be
willing to answer the question as to whether or not he was a member of
the Communist Party or ever had been a member of the Communist Party.
Mr. LAWRIE. As I stated before, I still think that, as you
pointed out, you are interested in the Constitution. And I certainly
think you should grant a witness here, after all, that is here at
your own invitation--not at his own request--he certainly should be
granted the right to raise a point of order, and if the committee feels
that--in my opinion they should feel that a witness should be granted
that right.
Mr. MOULDER. Let me say you are a witness who has been duly
subpenaed here. You are under oath to answer certain questions. You
have the privilege under the Constitution to decline to answer.
We are not going to be engaged with you in an argument concerning the
Constitution or the rules of the committee.
Now certain questions will be propounded to you by Mr. Wheeler. You
have the right as an American citizen to claim privilege under the
Constitution, which I assume you are about to do. You are certainly
not going to be permitted to enter into a soapbox argument with this
committee.
Proceed, Mr. Wheeler.
Mr. WHEELER. Would you briefly relate your employment record
for the last 10 years?
Mr. LAWRIE. I don’t see any basis for the honorable
gentleman’s statement. I still think that I have the right to raise my
point of order.
Mr. MOULDER. You are directed to answer the question
propounded to you.
Mr. LAWRIE. I still think I have----
Mr. MOULDER. Ask the next question.
(The witness confers with his counsel.)
Mr. LAWRIE. What was the question?
Mr. MOULDER. You haven’t answered it.
Mr. LAWRIE. I am asking the question.
Mr. MOULDER. You made a statement you were refusing to answer
without giving the legal reason for refusing to answer. I am directing
the examiner to proceed with the next question because you have refused
to answer it without cause.
Mr. WHEELER. Are you acquainted with Mrs. Barbara Hartle?
(The witness confers with his counsel.)
Mr. LAWRIE. I will have to state that I didn’t understand the
previous question.
Mr. MOULDER. Do you understand the present question?
Mr. WHEELER. I think the record will show that my question was
asked three times.
The question now is: Are you acquainted with Mrs. Barbara Hartle?
Mr. LAWRIE. Well, with reference to the last two questions, I
am----
Mr. MOULDER. We are not making reference to the last two
questions. He has asked you a simple question now, and you are directed
to answer.
(The witness confers with his counsel.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account