Who shall say so late in the day what might have checked the growth of
this movement? May Sinn Fein have been a distemper which, contracted,
must be gone through with? May it have been something altogether
different, a coming to rebirth of a people, as the nearly drowned man
is brought back to life with pain and tears? Is it that the gods
decide such and such a thing shall befall and determine when it shall
take place? The Gaelic League went before Sinn Fein like John of old.
“After me shall come another mightier than I.” It is sufficient that
the movement had a beginning, and like an avalanche gained way as it
moved.
First, in 1893, the language movement and talk of a Celtic revival. A
Dublin professor becomes inspired, and disciples gather about him to
master an antique tongue. Dr. Douglas Hyde, in everyday life a pleasant
sociable man, is touched with the geist when he pleads for the Gaelic
tongue. The movement grows, pen and pencil are snatched up, and the
remotest country-side is explored for folklore and fairy tales. There
arrives the Celtic illuminator with his paintbrush and his parchment,
and the Celtic jeweller, hammering out his brooches old fashioned a
thousand years ago. The prophets awaken--the seers of visions, the
dreamers of dreams. One dreams of the avatar that is to come, and sees
a phantom drummer drumming about the land. A second, reading a telegram
of the Russo-Japanese war, receives the intuition that Japan is the
masculine pole of the earth and Ireland is the feminine pole, and that
some mystic union of the two peoples will bring order into disorder. A
third, on Howth Hill, sees bloody giant figures moving across the sky.
A fourth, on the top of a tram, sees letters of fire in the heavens.
The national fire burning more brightly and more steadily. All the
while Arthur Griffith’s paper, _The United Irishman_, calling to the
nation to come together.
Then, about 1906, the birth of Sinn Fein, in those days not a thing of
the sword; but a mild and respectable movement claiming Ireland’s right
to develop along her own lines to nationhood. Half a dozen years and
this movement making little headway, then 1914, Ulster thwarting Home
Rule and the Citizen Army getting itself together; next 1916 and the
Easter Week rising. A thousand romantic men strike at Britain in her
extremity and rouse her at last.
Was that week which followed the Easter rising the time when a pitiless
policy might have brought this movement to an end? The general who
could ably have struck the blow was in Ireland at the time. The
movement was not yet a national matter. A thousand men had stood
together in what they believed was a splendid burst of chivalry;
but the nation was still impatient of them, thought them a little
ridiculous. A hammer was at hand to be used. Had the blow fallen, would
this live thing called Sinn Fein have been killed outright?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account