Irish ImpressionsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
History
Irish Impressions
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Ireland -- Civilization; Irish question
But the British blunder in Ireland was a much deeper and more
destructive thing. It can be summed up in one sentence; that whether or
no we were as black as we were painted, we actually painted ourselves
much blacker than we were. Bad as we were, we managed to look much
worse than we were. In a horrible unconsciousness we re-enacted history
through sheer ignorance of history. We were foolish enough to dress
up, and to play up, to the part of a villain in a very old tragedy. We
clothed ourselves almost carelessly in fire and sword; and if the fire
had been literally stage-fire or the sword a wooden sword, the merely
artistic blunder would have been quite as bad. For instance, I soon
came on the traces of a quarrel about some silly veto in the schools,
against Irish children wearing green rosettes. Anybody with a streak of
historical imagination would have avoided a quarrel in that particular
case about that particular colour. It is touching the talisman, it is
naming the name, it is striking the note of another relation in which
we were in the wrong, to the confusion of a new relation in which we
were in the right. Anybody of common sense, considering any other case,
can see the almost magic force of these material coincidences. If the
English armies in France in 1914 considered themselves justified
for some reason in executing some Frenchwoman, they would perhaps be
indiscreet if they killed her (however logically) tied to a stake in
the market-place of Rouen. If the people of Paris rose in the most
righteous revolt against the most corrupt conspiracy of some group of
the wealthy French Protestants, I should strongly advise them not to
fix the date for the vigil of St Bartholomew, or to go to work with
white scarfs tied round their arms. Many of us hope to see a Jewish
commonwealth reconstituted in Palestine; and we could easily imagine
some quarrel in which the government of Jerusalem was impelled to
punish some Greek or Latin pilgrim or monk. The Jews might even be
right in the quarrel and the Christian wrong. But it may be hinted that
the Jews would be ill-advised if they actually crowned him with thorns,
and killed him on a hill just outside Jerusalem. Now we must know by
this time, or the sooner we know it the better, that the whole mind
of that European society which we have helped to save, and in which
we have henceforth a part right of control, regards the Anglo-Irish
story as one of those black and white stories in a history book. It
sees the tragedy of Ireland as simply and clearly as the tragedy of
Christ or Joan of Arc. There may have been more to be said on the
coercive side than the culture of the Continent understands. So there
was a great deal more than is usually admitted to be said on the side
of the patriotic democracy which condemned Socrates; and a very great
deal to be said on the side of the imperial aristocracy which would
have crushed Washington. But these disputes will not take Socrates
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account