Irish ImpressionsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
History
Irish Impressions
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Ireland -- Civilization; Irish question
In logic a wise man will always put the cart before the horse. That
is to say, he will always put the end before the means; when he is
considering the question as a whole. He does not construct a cart in
order to exercise a horse. He employs a horse to draw a cart, and
whatever is in the cart. In all modern reasoning there is a tendency
to make the mere political beast of burden more important than the
chariot of man it is meant to draw. This has led to a dismissal of all
such spiritual questions in favour of what are called social questions;
and this to a too facile treatment of things like the religious
question in Belfast. There is a religious question; and it will not
have an irreligious answer. It will not be met by the limitation of
Christian faith, but rather by the extension of Christian charity. But
if a man says that there is no difference between a Protestant and a
Catholic, and that both can act in an identical fashion everywhere but
in a church or chapel, he is madly driving the cart-horse when he has
forgotten the cart. A religion is not the church a man goes to but the
cosmos he lives in; and if any sceptic forgets it, the maddest fanatic
beating an Orange drum about the Battle of the Boyne is a better
philosopher than he.
Many uneducated and some educated people in Belfast quite sincerely
believe that Roman priests are fiends, only waiting to rekindle the
fires of the Inquisition. For two simple reasons, however, I declined
to take this fact as evidence of anything except their sincerity.
First, because the stories, when reduced to their rudiment of truth,
generally resolved themselves into the riddle of poor Roman Catholics
giving money to their own religion, and seemed to deplore not so much
a dependence on priests as an independence of employers. And second,
for a reason drawn from my own experience, as well as common knowledge,
concerning the Protestant gentry in the south of Ireland. The southern
Unionists spoke quite without this special horror of Catholic priests
or peasants. They grumbled at them or laughed at them as a man grumbles
or laughs at his neighbours; but obviously they no more dreamed that
the priest would burn them than that he would eat them. If the priests
were as black as the black Protestants painted them, they would be at
their worst where they are with the majority, and would be known at
their worst by the minority. It was clear that Belfast held the more
bigoted tradition, not because it knew more of priests, but because
it knew less of them; not because it was on the spot, but because the
spot was barred. An even more general delusion was the idea that all
the southern Irish dreamed and did no work. I pointed out that this
also was inconsistent with concrete experience; since all over the
world a man who makes a small farm pay has to work very hard indeed.
In historic fact, the old notion that the Irish peasant did no work,
but only dreamed, had a simple explanation. It merely meant that he did
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account