Is a Ship Canal Practicable?: Notes, Historical and Statistical, Upon the Projected Routes for an Interoceanic Ship Canal Between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, in Which is Included a Short Account of the Character and Influence of the Canal of Suez, and the Probable Effects Upon the Commerce of the World of the Two Canals, Regarded Either as Rivals, or as Parts of One System of Interoceanic NavigationAbert, S. T. (Silvanus Thayer)
History
Is a Ship Canal Practicable?: Notes, Historical and Statistical, Upon the Projected Routes for an Interoceanic Ship Canal Between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, in Which is Included a Short Account of the Character and Influence of the Canal of Suez, and the Probable Effects Upon the Commerce of the World of the Two Canals, Regarded Either as Rivals, or as Parts of One System of Interoceanic Navigation
Abert, S. T. (Silvanus Thayer)
Canals, Interoceanic
Statistics have been accumulated to show to what extent commerce will
be benefited by the Suez Canal. The question of choice of route is
not dependent on distance alone. The winds and currents are natural
advantages or dangers which the navigator skillfully avoids or employs.
Steam, while it enables a vessel to contend with wind and current, is
yet obliged to obey their dictates. The distance of coaling stations,
the large space occupied by fuel to the exclusion of freight, renders
steam desirable rather as an auxiliary than as the sole means of
propulsion.
The Suez Canal has reduced the distances from European ports to India
about one-half. England derives an equal advantage, yet she has justly
regarded with apprehension the diversion of trade from the old route.
Anticipating the day when she would be compelled to acquiesce in the
opening of the new highway, she has shrewdly secured the military
command of the new course of trade which threatens her monopoly.
For the United States, the distances to the East are reduced to
from 2000 to 4000 miles. But on account of winds and currents for
homeward-bound ships, the old route by way of Cape Horn is still
preferable.
The following table, computed by M. de Lesseps, exhibits the distances
from European and American ports to Bombay:
_Tables showing the Gain of U. S. and European Ports._
════════════════╤════════╤════════╤══════════
│ BY │ BY │ SAVING
PORTS. │ CAPE │ SUEZ │ EFFECTED
│ HORN. │ CANAL. │ BY CANAL.
────────────────┼────────┼────────┼──────────
│ MILES. │ MILES. │ MILES.
Constantinople │ 14,760 │ 4,350 │ 10,410
Malta │ 14,130 │ 4,990 │ 9,140
Trieste │ 14,420 │ 5,660 │ 8,760
Marseilles │ 13,675 │ 5,745 │ 7,930
Cadiz │ 12,584 │ 5,384 │ 7,200
Lisbon │ 12,960 │ 6,050 │ 6,910
Bordeaux │ 13,670 │ 6,770 │ 6,900
Havre │ 14,030 │ 6,830 │ 7,200
London │ 14,400 │ 7,500 │ 6,900
Liverpool │ 14,280 │ 7,380 │ 6,900
Amsterdam │ 14,400 │ 7,500 │ 6,900
St. Petersburg │ 15,850 │ 8,950 │ 6,900
New York │ 15,000 │ 9,100 │ 5,900
New Orleans │ 15,600 │ 9,000 │ 6,600
────────────────┴────────┴────────┴──────────
The subjoined table contains distances from London, New York, and Port
Royal to certain Eastern ports, compared with distances to the same
ports from New York via the Pacific Railroad and Darien:
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account