Isabel of Castile and the making of the Spanish nation, 1451-1504 — John Shaqi
Isabel of Castile and the making of the Spanish nation, 1451-1504Plunket, Ierne L. (Ierne Lifford)
History
Isabel of Castile and the making of the Spanish nation, 1451-1504
Plunket, Ierne L. (Ierne Lifford)
Isabella I, Queen of Spain, 1451-1504; Spain -- History -- Ferdinand and Isabella, 1479-1516
Peace at all costs was his cry, and the old Bishop, exasperated, forgot
prudence in his anger. “Henceforth,” he exclaimed, “you will be thought
the most unworthy King Spain ever knew; and you will repent it, Señor,
when it is too late to make amends.”
Already knights and armed men were flocking to the royal standard, as
they heard of the rebels’ ultimatum. Many of them were genuinely shocked
at the attack on the dignity of the Crown, but for the greater number
Henry’s reckless prodigality of money and estates was not without its
attractions.
The King, however, proved deaf alike to warnings and scorn. After
elaborate discussions he and the Marquis of Villena arranged a temporary
peace, known as the Concord of Medina del Campo. Its terms were entirely
favourable to the conspirators, for Henry, heedless of the implied slur
on his honour, agreed to acknowledge Alfonso as his heir, on the
understanding that he should later marry the Infanta Joanna. With
incredible shortsightedness he also consented to hand his brother over
to the Marquis; and on the 30th of November, 1464, the oath to the new
heir to the throne was publicly taken. This was followed by the
elevation of the Count of Ledesma, who had resigned the Mastership of
Santiago in favour of the young Prince, to the rank of Duke of
Alburquerque.
The question of the misgovernment of the country and its cure was to be
referred to a committee of five leading nobles, two to be selected by
either party, while the Prior-General of the Order of San Geronimo was
given a casting vote. This “Junta of Medina del Campo,” held in January,
1465, proved no lasting settlement, for the King’s representatives
allowed themselves to be won over to the views of the league, with
disastrous results for their own master.
“They straitened the power of the King to such an extent,” says a
chronicler, “that they left him almost nothing of his dominion save the
title of King, without power to command or any pre-eminence.”
Henry was roused at last, but it was only to fall a victim to fresh
treachery.
Two of the most prominent members of the league in its beginnings had
been Don Alonso Carrillo, Archbishop of Toledo, uncle of the Marquis of
Villena, and the Admiral of Castile, Don Fadrique Enriquez. The former
had little of his nephew’s suave charm and adaptability, and his
haughty, irascible nature was more suited to the camp than the Primacy
of the Castilian Church.
“He was a great lover of war,” says Pulgar in his _Claros Varones_, “and
while he was praised on the one side for his open-handedness he was
blamed on the other for his turbulence, considering the religious vows
by which he was bound.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account