Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Precisely; but as the work of de Gasparin called forth numberless
_Answers_, _Defenses_, and _Memoirs_, it was then demonstrated by his
own work that as he was a Protestant, in point of religious fanaticism,
he was as little to be relied upon as des Mousseaux and de Mirville.
The former is a profoundly pious Calvinist, while the two latter are
fanatical Roman Catholics. Moreover, the very words of de Gasparin
betray the spirit of partisanship:—“I feel I have a duty to perform....
I lift high the Protestant flag against the Ultramontane banner!”
etc.[208] In such matters as the nature of the so-called spiritual
phenomena, no evidence can be relied upon, except the disinterested
testimony of cold _unprejudiced_ witnesses and science. Truth is one,
and Legion is the name for religious sects; every one of which claims
to have found the unadulterated truth; as “the Devil is the chief
pillar of the (Catholic) Church,” so all supernaturalism and miracles
ceased, in de Gasparin’s opinion, “with apostleship.”
But Mr. Crookes mentioned another eminent scholar, Thury, of Geneva,
professor of natural history, who was a brother-investigator with
Gasparin in the phenomena of Valleyres. This professor contradicts
point-blank the assertions of his colleague. “The first and
most necessary condition,” says Gasparin, “is the _will_ of the
experimenter; without the will, one would obtain nothing; you can form
the chain (the circle) for twenty-four hours consecutively, without
obtaining the least movement.”[209]
The above proves only that de Gasparin makes no difference between
phenomena purely magnetic, produced by the persevering will of the
sitters among whom there may be not even a single medium, developed
or undeveloped, and the so-called spiritual ones. While the first can
be produced _consciously_ by nearly every person, who has a firm and
determined will, the latter overpowers the sensitive very often against
his own consent, and always acts independently of him. _The mesmerizer
wills a thing, and if he is powerful enough, that thing is done. The
medium_, even if he had an honest purpose to succeed, _may get no
manifestations at all; the less he exercises his will, the better the
phenomena: the more he feels anxious, the less he is likely to get
anything_; to mesmerize requires a positive nature, to be a medium a
perfectly passive one. This is the Alphabet of Spiritualism, and no
medium is ignorant of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account