Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 1 (of 2), Science : $b A master-key to mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
NABIA.—Seership, soothsaying. This oldest and most respected of
mystic phenomena, is the name given to prophecy in the _Bible_, and
is correctly included among the spiritual powers, such as divination,
clairvoyant visions, trance-conditions, and oracles. But while
enchanters, diviners, and even astrologers are strictly condemned in
the Mosaic books, prophecy, seership, and nabia appear as the special
gifts of heaven. In early ages they were all termed _Epoptai_, the
Greek word for seers, clairvoyants; after which they were designated
as _Nebim_, “the plural of Nebo, the Babylonian god of wisdom.” The
kabalist distinguishes between the _seer_ and the _magician_; one is
passive, the other active; _Nebirah_, is one who looks into futurity
and a clairvoyant; _Nebi-poel_, he who possesses _magic powers_. We
notice that Elijah and Apollonius resorted to the same means to isolate
themselves from the disturbing influences of the outer world, viz.:
wrapping their heads entirely in a woolen mantle: from its being an
electric non-conductor we must suppose.
OCCULTIST.—One who studies the various branches of occult science.
The term is used by the French kabalists (See Eliphas Levi’s works).
Occultism embraces the whole range of psychological, physiological,
cosmical, physical, and spiritual phenomena. From the word _occult_
hidden or secret; applying therefore to the study of the _Kabala_,
astrology, alchemy, and all arcane sciences.
PAGAN GODS.—This term gods is erroneously understood by most of the {xxxviii}
reading public, to mean idols. The idea attached to them is _not_ that
of something objective or anthropomorphical. With the exception of
occasions when “gods” mean either divine planetary entities (angels),
or disembodied spirits of pure men, the term simply conveys to the mind
of the mystic—whether Hindu Hotar, Mazdean Mage, Egyptian hierophant,
or disciple of the Greek philosophers—the idea of a visible or cognized
manifestation of an invisible potency of nature. And such occult
potencies are invoked under the appellation of various gods, who, for
the time being, are personating these powers. Thus every one of the
numberless deities of the Hindu, Greek, and Egyptian Pantheons, are
simply Powers of the “Unseen Universe.” When the officiating Brahman
invokes Aditya—who, in her cosmic character, is the goddess-sun—he
simply _commands_ that potency (personified in some god), which, as
he asserts, “resides in the Mantra, as the sacred _Vâch_.” These
god-powers are allegorically regarded as the divine _Hotars_ of
the Supreme One; while the priest (Brahman) is the human Hotar who
officiates on earth, and representing that particular Power becomes,
ambassador-like, invested with the very potency which he personates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account