Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
_Old Testament_ as their standard, no wonder that the Christians were
forced by the exceptional position in which they were placed through
their own ignorance, to make the best of it.
The first groups of Christians, whom Renan shows numbering but from
seven to twelve men in _each church_, belonged unquestionably to the
poorest and most ignorant classes. They had and could have no idea of
the highly philosophical doctrines of the Platonists and Gnostics,
and evidently knew as little about their own newly-made-up religion.
To these, who if Jews, had been crushed under the tyrannical dominion
of the “law,” as enforced by the elders of the synagogues, and if
Pagans had been always excluded, as the lower castes are until now
in India, from the religious mysteries, the God of the Jews and
the “Father” preached by Jesus were all one. The contention which
reigned from the first years following the death of Jesus, between
the two parties, the Pauline and the Petrine--were deplorable. What
one did, the other deemed a sacred duty to undo. If the _Homilies_
are considered apocryphal, and cannot very well be accepted as an
infallible standard by which to measure the animosity which raged
between the two apostles, we have the _Bible_, and the proofs
afforded therein are plentiful.
So hopelessly entangled seems Irenæus in his fruitless endeavors to
describe, to all outward appearance at least, the true doctrines of
the many Gnostic sects of which he treats and to present them at the
same time as abominable “heresies,” that he either deliberately,
or through ignorance, confounds all of them in such a way that
few metaphysicians would be able to disentangle them, without the
_Kabala_ and the _Codex_ as the true keys. Thus, for instance, he
cannot even tell the difference between the Sethianites and the
Ophites, and tells us that they called the “God of all,” “_Hominem_,”
a MAN, and his mind the SECOND man, or the “_Son of man_.” So does
Theodoret, who lived more than two centuries after Irenæus, and who
makes a sad mess of the chronological order in which the various
sects succeeded each other.[297] Neither the Sethianites, (a branch
of the Jewish Nazarenes) nor the Ophites, a purely Greek sect, have
ever held anything of the kind. Irenæus contradicts his own words by
describing in another place the doctrines of Cerinthus, the direct
disciple of Simon Magus. He says that Cerinthus taught that the world
was not created by the FIRST GOD, but by a virtue (virtus) or power,
an Æon so distant from the First Cause that he was even ignorant of
HIM who _is above all things_. This Æon subjected Jesus, he begot him
physically through Joseph from one who was not a virgin, but simply
the wife of that Joseph, and Jesus was born like all other men.
Viewed from this physical aspect of his nature, Jesus was called the
“son of man.” It is only after his _baptism_, that _Christos_, the
anointed, descended from the Princeliness of above, in the figure of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account