Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
Now, this verse reads: “For there are three that bear record in
Heaven, the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost; and these three are
one.” This verse, which has been “appointed to be read in churches,”
is now known to be spurious. It is not to be found in any Greek
manuscript, save one at Berlin, which was transcribed from some
interpolated paraphrase between the lines. In the first and second
editions of Erasmus, printed in 1516 and 1519, this allusion to
these three heavenly witnesses is _omitted_; and the text is not
contained in any Greek manuscript which was written earlier than the
fifteenth century.[300] It was not mentioned by either of the Greek
ecclesiastical writers nor by the early Latin fathers, so anxious to
get at every proof in support of their trinity; and it was omitted
by Luther in his German version. Edward Gibbon was early in pointing
out its spurious character. Archbishop Newcome rejected it, and the
Bishop of Lincoln expresses his conviction that it is spurious.[301]
There are twenty-eight Greek authors--Irenæus, Clemens, and
Athanasius included, who neither quote nor mention it; and seventeen
Latin writers, numbering among them Augustine, Jerome, Ambrosius,
Cyprian, and Pope Eusebius, who appear utterly ignorant of it. “It
is evident that if the text of the heavenly witnesses had been known
from the beginning of Christianity the ancients would have eagerly
seized it, inserted it in their creeds, quoted it repeatedly against
the heretics, and selected it for the brightest ornament of every
book that they wrote upon the subject of the Trinity.”[302]
Thus falls to the ground the strongest trinitarian pillar. Another
not less obvious forgery is quoted from Sir Isaac Newton’s words by
the editor of the _Apocryphal New Testament_. Newton observes “that
what the Latins have done to this text (_First Epistle of John_, v.),
the Greeks have done to that of St. Paul (_Timothy_ iii. 16).” For,
by changing ΟΣ into ΘΣ, the abbreviation of Θεος (God), in the
Alexandrian manuscript, from which their subsequent copies were made,
they now read, “_Great is the mystery of godliness_, GOD _manifested
in the flesh_;” whereas all the churches, for the first four or five
centuries, and the authors of all the ancient versions, Jerome, as
well as the rest, read: “Great is the mystery of godliness WHICH WAS
_manifested in the flesh_.” Newton adds, that now that the disputes
over this forgery are over, they that read GOD made manifest in the
flesh, instead of the _godliness which was_ manifested in the flesh,
think this passage “one of the most obvious and pertinent texts for
the business.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account