Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
It is a most suggestive fact that there is not a word in the so-called
sacred _Scriptures_ to show that Jesus was actually regarded as a God
by his disciples. Neither before nor after his death did they pay him
divine honors. Their relation to him was only that of disciples and
“master;” by which name they addressed him, as the followers of
Pythagoras and Plato addressed their respective masters before them.
Whatever words may have been put into the mouths of Jesus, Peter,
John, Paul, and others, there is not a single act of adoration
recorded on their part, nor did Jesus himself ever declare his
identity with _his Father_. He accused the Pharisees of _stoning_
their prophets, not of deicide. He termed himself the son of God, but
took care to assert repeatedly that they were all the children of God,
who was the Heavenly Father of all. In preaching this, he but repeated
a doctrine taught ages earlier by Hermes, Plato, and other
philosophers. Strange contradiction! Jesus, whom we are asked to
worship as the one living God, is found, immediately after his
Resurrection, saying to Mary Magdalene: “I am not yet ascended _to my
Father_; but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto _my
Father_ and _your_ Father, and to _my_ God and _your_ God!” (_John_
xx. 17.)
Does this look like identifying himself with his Father? “_My_
Father and _your_ Father, _my_ God and _your_ God,” implies, on
his part, a desire to be considered on a perfect equality with his
brethren--nothing more. Theodoret writes: “The hæretics agree with
us respecting the beginning of all things.... But they say there is
not one Christ (God), but one above, and the other below. And this
last _formerly dwelt in many_; but _the Jesus_, they at one time say
is _from_ God, at another they call him a SPIRIT.”[341] This spirit
is the Christos, the _messenger_ of life, who is sometimes called
the Angel _Gabriel_ (in Hebrew, the mighty one of God), and who took
with the Gnostics the place of the Logos, while the Holy Spirit was
considered _Life_.[342] With the sect of the Nazarenes, though,
the Spiritus, or Holy Ghost, had less honor. While nearly every
Gnostic sect considered it a Female Power, whether they called it
_Binah_, נינה, _Sophia_, the Divine Intellect, with the Nazarene sect
it was the _Female Spiritus_, the astral light, the genetrix of all
things of _matter_, the chaos in its evil aspect, made _turbido_ by
the Demiurge. At the creation of man, “it was light on the side of
the FATHER, and it was light (material light) on the side of the
MOTHER. And this is the ‘_two-fold_ man,’”[343] says the _Sohar_.
“That day (the last one) will perish the seven badly-disposed
stellars, also the sons of man, who have confessed the _Spiritus_,
the Messias (false), the Deus, and the MOTHER of the SPIRITUS shall
perish.”[344]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account