Sar (circle, saros) is the Babylonian god of the sky. He is also Assaros or Asshur (the son of Shem), and Zero--Zero-ana, the chakkra, or wheel, boundless time. Hence, as the first step taken by Zoroaster, while founding his new religion, was to change the most sacred deities of the Sanscrit _Veda_ into names of evil spirits, in his Zend _Scriptures_, and even to reject a number of them, we find no traces in the _Avesta_ of Chakkra--the symbolic circle of the sky. Elam, another of the sons of Shem, is _Oulam_ עולם, and refers to an order or cycle of events. In _Ecclesiastes_ iii. 11, it is termed “world.” In _Ezekiel_ xxvi. 20, “of old time.” In _Genesis_ iii. 22, the word stands as “forever;” and in chapter ix. 16, “eternal.” Finally, the term is completely defined in _Genesis_ vi. 4, in the following words: “There were _nephelim_ (giants, fallen men, or Titans) on the earth.” The word is synonymous with Æon, αιων. In _Proverbs_ viii. 23, it reads: “I was effused from _Oulam_, from _Ras_” (wisdom). By this sentence, the wise king-kabalist refers to one of the mysteries of the human spirit--the immortal crown of the man-trinity. While it ought to read as above, and be interpreted kabalistically to mean that the _I_ (or my eternal, immortal _Ego_), the spiritual entity, was effused from the boundless and nameless eternity, through the creative wisdom of the unknown God, it reads in the canonical translation: “The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old!” which is unintelligible nonsense, without the kabalistic interpretation. When Solomon is made to say that _I_ was “from the beginning ... while, as yet, he (the Supreme Deity) had not made the earth nor the highest part of the dust of the world ... I was there,” and “when he appointed the foundations of the earth ... then I was by him, _as one brought up with him_,” what can the kabalist mean by the “_I_,” but his own divine spirit, a drop effused from that eternal fountain of light and wisdom--the universal spirit of the Deity?