Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
The thread of glory emitted by En-Soph from the highest of the
three kabalistic heads, through which “all things shine with
light,” the thread which makes its exit through Adam _Primus_, is
the individual spirit of every man. “I was daily his (En-Soph’s)
delight, rejoicing always before him ... and my delights were
_with the sons of men_,” adds Solomon, in the same chapter of the
_Proverbs_. The immortal spirit delights in the _sons of men_, who,
without this spirit, are but dualities (physical body and astral
soul, or that _life-principle_ which animates even the lowest of the
animal kingdom). But, we have seen that the doctrine teaches that
this spirit cannot unite itself with that man in whom matter and the
grossest propensities of his animal soul will be ever crowding it
out. Therefore, Solomon, who is made to speak under the inspiration
of his own spirit, that possesses him for the time being, utters
the following words of wisdom: “Hearken unto me, my son” (the dual
man), “blessed are they who keep my ways.... Blessed is the man that
heareth me, watching daily at my gates.... For whoso _findeth me,
findeth life_, and shall obtain favor of the Lord.... But he that
sinneth _against me_ wrongeth his _own soul_ ... and loves _death_”
(_Proverbs_ vii. 1-36).
This chapter, as interpreted, is made by some theologians, like
everything else, to apply to Christ, the “Son of God,” who states
repeatedly, that he who follows him obtains eternal life, and
conquers death. But even in its distorted translation it can be
demonstrated that it referred to anything but to the alleged Saviour.
Were we to accept it in this sense, then, the Christian theology
would have to return, _nolens volens_, to Averroism and Buddhism;
to the doctrine of emanation, in short; for Solomon says: “I was
effused” from Oulam and Rasit, both of which are a part of the
Deity; and thus Christ would not be as their doctrine claims, God
himself, but only an _emanation_ of Him, like the Christos of the
Gnostics. Hence, the meaning of the personified Gnostic Æon, the word
signifying cycles or determined periods in the eternity and at the
same time, representing a hierarchy of celestial beings--spirits.
Thus Christ is sometimes termed the “Eternal Æon.” But the word
“eternal” is erroneous in relation to the Æons. Eternal is that which
has neither beginning nor end; but the “Emanations” or Æons, although
having lived as absorbed in the divine essence from the eternity,
when once individually emanated, must be said to have a beginning.
They may be therefore _endless_ in this spiritual life, never eternal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account