Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
“Adan Inferior is distributed into its own paths, into thirty-two
sides of paths, yet it is not known to any one but _Seir_. But no one
knows the SUPERIOR ADAN nor His paths, except that Long Face”--the
Supreme God.[508] Seir is the Nazarene “genius,” who is called Æbel
Zivo; and Gabriel Legatus--also “Apostle Gabriel.”[509] The Nazarenes
held with the kabalists that even the Messiah who was to come did
not know the “_Superior_ Adan,” the concealed Deity; no one except
the _Supreme_ God; thus showing that above the Supreme Intelligible
Deity, there is one still more secret and unrevealed. Seir-Anpin
is the third God, while “Logos,” according to Philo Judæus, is
the second one.[510] This is distinctly shown in the _Codex_. The
false Messiah shall say: “I am Deus, son of Deus; my Father sent me
here.... I am the first _Legate_, I am Æbel Zivo, I am come from on
high! But distrust him; for he will not be Æbel Zivo. Æbel Zivo will
not permit himself to be seen in this age.”[511] Hence the belief
of some Gnostics that it was not Æbel Zivo (Archangel Gabriel) who
“_overshadowed_” Mary, but Ilda-Baoth, who formed the _material body_
of Jesus; _Christos_ uniting himself with him only at the moment of
baptism in the Jordan.
Can we doubt Nork’s assertion that “the Bereshith Rabba, the oldest
part of the Midrash Rabboth, _was known to the Church Fathers in a
Greek translation_?”[512]
But if, on the one hand, they were sufficiently acquainted with the
different religious systems of their neighbors to have enabled them
to build a new religion alleged to be distinct from all others,
their ignorance of the _Old Testament_ itself, let alone the more
complicated questions of Grecian metaphysics, is now found to have
been deplorable. “So, for instance, in _Matthew_ xxvii. 9 f., the
passage from _Zechariah_ xi. 12, 13, is attributed to Jeremiah,” says
the author of _Supernatural Religion_. “In _Mark_ i. 2, a quotation
from _Malachi_ iii. 1, is ascribed to Isaiah. In _1 Corinthians_,
ii. 9, a passage is quoted as _Holy Scripture_, which is not found in
the _Old Testament_ at all, but which is taken, as Origen and Jerome
state, from an apocryphal work, _The Revelation of Elias_ (Origen:
_Tract._ xxxv.), and the passage is similarly quoted by the so-called
_Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians_ (xxxiv.)”. How reliable are
the pious Fathers in their explanations of divers heresies may be
illustrated in the case of Epiphanius, who mistook the Pythagorean
sacred Tetrad, called in the Valentinian _Gnosis_, Kol-Arbas, for
a _heretic leader_.[513] What with the involuntary blunders, and
deliberate falsifications of the teachings of those who differed in
views with them; the canonization of the mythological Aura Placida
(gentle breeze), into a pair of Christian martyrs--St. Aura and St.
Placida;[514] the deification of a _spear_ and a _cloak_, under
the names of SS. Longimus and Amphibolus;[515] and the Patristic
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account