Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
which signify _creation_, _conservation_, and _transformation_. He
alone could expound its meaning in the presence of the initiates
of the third and supreme degree. Whomsoever among these initiates
revealed to a profane a single one of the truths, even the smallest
of the secrets entrusted to his care, was put to death. He who
received the confidence had to share his fate.
“Finally, to crown this able system,” says Jacolliot, “there existed
a word still more superior to the mysterious monosyllable--A U M, and
which rendered him who came into the possession of its key nearly the
equal of Brahma himself. The Brahm-âtma alone possessed this key, and
transmitted it in a sealed casket to his successor.
“This unknown word, of which no human power could, even to-day, when
the Brahmanical authority has been crushed under the Mongolian and
European invasions, to-day, when each pagoda has its Brahm-âtma,[42]
_force the disclosure_, was engraved in a golden triangle and
preserved in a sanctuary of the temple of Asgartha, whose Brahm-âtma
alone held the keys. He also bore upon his tiara _two crossed keys_
supported by two kneeling Brahmans, symbol of the precious deposit
of which he had the keeping.... This word and this triangle were
engraved upon the tablet of the ring that this religious chief wore
as one of the signs of his dignity; it was also framed in a golden
sun on the altar, where every morning the Supreme Pontiff offered
the sacrifice of the sarvameda, or sacrifice to all the forces of
nature.”[43]
Is this clear enough? And will the Catholics still maintain that it
was the Brahmans of 4,000 years ago who copied the ritual, symbols,
and dress of the Roman Pontiffs? We would not feel in the least
surprised.
Without going very far back into antiquity for comparisons, if we
only stop at the fourth and fifth centuries of our era, and contrast
the so-called “heathenism” of the third Neo-platonic Eclectic School
with the growing Christianity, the result may not be favorable to
the latter. Even at that early period, when the new religion had
hardly outlined its contradictory dogmas; when the champions of the
bloodthirsty Cyril knew not themselves whether Mary was to become
“the Mother of God,” or rank as a “demon” in company with Isis; when
the memory of the meek and lowly Jesus still lingered lovingly in
every Christian heart, and his words of mercy and charity vibrated
still in the air, even then the Christians were outdoing the Pagans
in every kind of ferocity and religious intolerance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account