Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theologyBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
Isis unveiled, Volume 2 (of 2), Theology : $b A master-key to the mysteries of ancient and modern science and theology
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
It certainly does seem as if the events of the first centuries of
Christianity were but the reflection of the images thrown upon
the mirror of the future at the time of the Exodus. During the
stormy days of Irenæus, the Platonic philosophy, with its mystical
submersion into Deity, was not so obnoxious after all to the new
doctrine as to prevent the Christians from helping themselves to its
abstruse metaphysics in every way and manner. Allying themselves with
the ascetical theurapeutæ--forefathers and models of the Christian
monks and hermits, it was in Alexandria, let it be remembered, that
they laid the first foundations of the purely Platonic trinitarian
doctrine. It became the Plato-Philonean doctrine later, and such as
we find it now. Plato considered the divine nature under a three-fold
modification of the _First Cause_, the reason or _Logos_, and the
soul or spirit of the universe. “The three archial or original
principles,” says Gibbon,[45] “were represented in the Platonic
system as three gods, united with each other by a mysterious and
ineffable generation.” Blending this transcendental idea with the
more hypostatic figure of the _Logos_ of Philo, whose doctrine was
that of the oldest Kabala, and who viewed the King Messiah, as the
metatron, or “the angel of the Lord,” the _Legatus_ descended in
flesh, but not the _Ancient of Days_ Himself;[46] the Christians
clothed with this mythical representation of the Mediator for the
fallen race of Adam, Jesus, the son of Mary. Under this unexpected
garb his personality was all but lost. In the modern Jesus of the
Christian Church, we find the ideal of the imaginative Irenæus, not
the adept of the Essenes, the obscure reformer from Galilee. We see
him under the disfigured Plato-Philonean mask, not as the disciples
heard him on the mount.
So far then the heathen philosophy had helped them in the building
of the principal dogma. But when the theurgists of the third
Neo-platonic school, deprived of their ancient Mysteries, strove
to blend the doctrines of Plato with those of Aristotle, and by
combining the two philosophies added to their theosophy the primeval
doctrines of the Oriental _Kabala_, then the Christians from rivals
became persecutors. Once that the metaphysical allegories of Plato
were being prepared to be discussed in public in the form of Grecian
dialectics, all the elaborate system of the Christian trinity would
be unravelled and the divine prestige completely upset. The eclectic
school, reversing the order, had adopted the inductive method; and
this method became its death-knell. Of all things on earth, logic and
reasonable explanations were the most hateful to the new religion of
mystery; for they threatened to unveil the whole ground-work of the
trinitarian conception; to apprise the multitude of the doctrine of
emanations, and thus destroy the unity of the whole. It could not be
permitted, and it was not. History records the _Christ_-like means
that were resorted to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account