Many of the best minds of Islâm have perceived in this rule a virtual
prohibition of polygamy. The moral effect of the institution on Mussulman
society as a whole can hardly be ignored: it has prevented the growth in
Mussulman countries, untainted by foreign social ideas, of that class
whose existence is alike an outrage on our humanity and a disgrace to
civilisation. Considering how the profession of the _hetairai_, honoured
among some nations, despised among others, but tolerated by most, has
flourished through all ages, it is no small credit to the Arabian
Teacher that it was so effectually stopped in Islâm.
=Divorce.=—As in the Jewish system, option was given to the husband to
dissolve the marriage tie. At the same time the act was pronounced to be
‘the most abominable in the sight of the Lord.’
=Bondsmen and Bondswomen.=—Only persons taken in lawful warfare were
permitted to be held in bondage. The emancipation of bonds-folk was
declared one of the highest acts of piety.[24] And any person who made
a provision for their ransom was the favoured of God. Traffic in human
beings was strictly forbidden, and the man who dealt in slaves was
pronounced to be the accursed of God. In a word, human chattelhood is
unknown in Islâm; and the institution which is called ‘slavery’ in Europe
and America has no existence in Mohammedan countries. In Islâm, parents
were not to be separated from children; brothers from brothers, or one
relation from another. The Moslem bondsman and bondswoman were members of
the master’s family; were on no account to be ill-treated; were to be fed
and clothed like the masters and mistresses. Once emancipated they could
intermarry with the master’s sons or daughters. Relations with bondswomen
were sanctioned by the Rabbinical Laws. They were common in Christian
communities, and were freely practised in the Southern States of North
America until very recent times by people who considered themselves and
were regarded by many others as highly civilised. Among them the issue of
a slave-woman was for ever a slave: the smallest taint of slave-blood,
however remote, subjected the unfortunate being to be sold as a slave.
Although the system of Mohammed, with the object of avoiding a drastic
solution, tolerated relations with bondswomen,—with far greater humanity
it declared that the issue of such connections were legitimate, and
that the bondswoman who bore children to her master was _ipso facto_
emancipated; that thenceforth she was no more his bondswoman, but ‘the
mother of his child.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account