Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his workStukeley, William
History
Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his work
Stukeley, William
Great Britain -- Antiquities -- Early works to 1800; Great Britain -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
and from the memory, perhaps, of these kind of exercises, sprung the
notion of Sir John Hautvil’s Coyts, he being a strong and valiant man,
and expert in these games of our hardy ancestors: the vulgar confounded
the two histories into one, and, fond of the marvellous, applied the
name of Coyts to those monstrous stones. So in Wales to this day they
call the _Kromlechea_, Arthur’s Coyts.
Thus therefore we may in imagination view a solemn sacrifice of
magnanimous Britons, the Druids and other priests, the kings and people
assembled: we may follow them imitating the course of the Sun, and,
like the ancient Greeks at their solemn games, celebrating splendidly,
in honour of their Gods, upon the winding banks of the rivers. The
temple at Diospolis in Egypt, described by Strabo, XVII. is not unlike
our Celtic ones, having a _dromos_, or circ, before it, with stones cut
like _sphynges_ to mark out the _route_, and a _portico_ quite round.
The walls, says he, are as high as the temple, which is without roof,
and covered over with sculpture of large figures. There is one part
composed of abundance of huge pillars set in very many rows, having
nothing painted or elegant, but seems like an empty labour, as he
expresses it; and this was, because the Grecian temples of his country
were covered over, and the walls adorned with painting and carving,
and all sorts of curiosities in art. In this temple (he proceeds)
were formerly great houses for the priests, men given to philosophy
and astronomy: but now that order and discipline is failed, and only
some sorry fellows left, that take care of the sacrifices, and show
the things to strangers. Eudoxus and Plato went hither, and lived
thirteen years to learn of them. These priests knew the minute excess
of the year above 365 days, and many more like things; for, says he,
the Greeks were ignorant of the year at that time. Thus far Strabo. It
is notorious from the foregoing particulars, how near a resemblance
these had to our Celtic temples, and likewise to the famous ruins
at Persepolis, which I always looked upon as a great temple of the
Persians. Those that think it the ruins of a royal palace, run away
content with the report of the ignorant people living thereabouts.
This temple of the Egyptians, which Strabo describes, had no
roof; and therefore it would be absurd to place paintings in it, and
fine carvings of ivory, gold and marble, from the hand of Phidias,
or Praxiteles, as was the usage of the Greeks; whence Strabo takes
occasion to throw a sarcasm upon people that he would not have thought
so elegant as his countrymen. It is certain the Egyptians, as well as
our Celts, studied greatness and astonishment, beyond the nice and
curious; as is visible in all their works, such as the pyramids, the
obelisks, Pompey’s pillar, the monstrous _colossi_ and _sphynges_, of
which we have many accounts in writers, and many of their prodigious
works still left, which defy time by their magnitude, like our Celtic:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account